These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18389676)

  • 1. Evaluation of residual dentin after conventional and chemomechanical caries removal using SEM.
    Corrêa FN; Rodrigues Filho LE; Rodrigues CR
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2008; 32(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 18389676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentin Topographic Features following Chemomechanical Caries Removal in Primary Teeth.
    Kotb RM; Elkateb MA; Ahmed AM; Kawana KY; El Meligy OA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(6):472-479. PubMed ID: 27805895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of chemomechanical caries removal on bonding of self-etching adhesives to caries-affected dentin.
    Hamama HH; Yiu CK; Burrow MF
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Dec; 16(6):507-16. PubMed ID: 25516887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars : evaluation of marginal leakage and shear bond strength in bonded restorations--an in vitro study.
    Viral PM; Nagarathna C; Shakuntala BS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013; 37(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 23855171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of caries removal techniques on the bond strength of adhesives to caries-affected primary dentin in vitro.
    Yildiz E; Sirinkaraarslan E; Yegin Z; Cebe MA; Tosun G
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 24295006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bonding of single-component adhesives to dentin following chemomechanical caries removal.
    El-Kholany NR; Abdelaziz KM; Zaghloul NM; Aboulenien N
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):281-7. PubMed ID: 16430008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive interface in primary teeth.
    Rontani RM; Ducatti CH; Garcia-Godoy F; De Goes MF
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 11314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv and Papacarie - a papain gel.
    Kumar J; Nayak M; Prasad KL; Gupta N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):697. PubMed ID: 23422631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nanoleakage of dentin adhesive systems bonded to Carisolv-treated dentin.
    Kubo S; Li H; Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):387-95. PubMed ID: 12120777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chemical versus conventional caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a microhardness study.
    Corrêa FN; Rocha Rde O; Rodrigues Filho LE; Muench A; Rodrigues CR
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2007; 31(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 17550045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chemical, morphological and microhardness changes of dentine after chemomechanical caries removal.
    Hamama HH; Yiu CK; Burrow MF; King NM
    Aust Dent J; 2013 Sep; 58(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 23981208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of effects of chemo-mechanical and conventional caries removal on dentinal morphology and its bonding characteristics - an SEM study.
    Arora R; Goswami M; Chaudhary S; Chaitra TR; Kishor A; Rallan M
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2012 Aug; 13(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 22883356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Viability of intratubular bacteria after chemomechanical caries removal.
    Hamama HH; Yiu CK; Burrow MF
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1972-6. PubMed ID: 25190603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strength of caries-affected human dentine after three different caries removal techniques.
    Sirin Karaarslan E; Yildiz E; Cebe MA; Yegin Z; Ozturk B
    J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):793-801. PubMed ID: 22687577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interfacial micromorphology of three adhesive systems created in caries-affected dentin.
    Sakoolnamarka R; Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
    Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 12967076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of Carisolv on resin adhesion for two different adhesive systems to sound human primary dentin and young permanent dentin.
    Hosoya Y; Shinkawa H; Marshall GW
    J Dent; 2005 Apr; 33(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 15781136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of Carisolv for resin adhesion to sound human primary dentin and young permanent dentin.
    Hosoya Y; Kawashita Y; Marshall GW; Goto G
    J Dent; 2001 Mar; 29(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 11306157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv or conventional hand excavation in deciduous teeth in vitro.
    Flückiger L; Waltimo T; Stich H; Lussi A
    J Dent; 2005 Feb; 33(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 15683888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bonding of resin composite to caries-affected dentin after Carisolv(®) treatment.
    Zawaideh F; Palamara JE; Messer LB
    Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 21703073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A scanning electron microscopic study of different caries removal techniques on human dentin.
    Yazici AR; Ozgünaltay G; Dayangaç B
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):360-6. PubMed ID: 12120773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.