218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18389735)
1. Masticatory fatigue, fracture resistance, and marginal discrepancy of ceramic partial crowns with and without coverage of compromised cusps.
Stappert CF; Abe P; Kurths V; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Adhes Dent; 2008 Feb; 10(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 18389735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance.
Stappert CF; Guess PC; Chitmongkolsuk S; Gerds T; Strub JR
Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 17380803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of preparation design and ceramic thicknesses on fracture resistance and failure modes of premolar partial coverage restorations.
Guess PC; Schultheis S; Wolkewitz M; Zhang Y; Strub JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Oct; 110(4):264-73. PubMed ID: 24079561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue.
Guess PC; Vagkopoulou T; Zhang Y; Wolkewitz M; Strub JR
J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 24161516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design.
Clausen JO; Abou Tara M; Kern M
Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20181388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture resistance of different partial-coverage ceramic molar restorations: An in vitro investigation.
Stappert CF; Att W; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Apr; 137(4):514-22. PubMed ID: 16637481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: influence of remaining cusp wall thickness on the marginal integrity and enamel crack formation in vitro.
Krifka S; Anthofer T; Fritzsch M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Federlin M
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 19192835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of root-canal treated mandibular molars with intracoronal restorations: effect of thermocycling and mechanical loading.
Hitz T; Ozcan M; Göhring TN
J Adhes Dent; 2010 Aug; 12(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 20157655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations.
Soares CJ; Martins LR; Fonseca RB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Fernandes Neto AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):421-9. PubMed ID: 16765154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal adaptation of different types of all-ceramic partial coverage restorations after exposure to an artificial mouth.
Stappert CF; Denner N; Gerds T; Strub JR
Br Dent J; 2005 Dec; 199(12):779-83; discussion 777. PubMed ID: 16395369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of restoration thickness and dental bonding surface on the fracture resistance of full-coverage occlusal veneers made from lithium disilicate ceramic.
Sasse M; Krummel A; Klosa K; Kern M
Dent Mater; 2015 Aug; 31(8):907-15. PubMed ID: 26051232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. All-ceramic partial coverage premolar restorations. Cavity preparation design, reliability and fracture resistance after fatigue.
Stappert CF; Guess PC; Gerds T; Strub JR
Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 16296437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage.
Xie KX; Wang XY; Gao XJ; Yuan CY; Li JX; Chu CH
Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of cavity design on the fracture resistance of zirconia onlay ceramics.
Oyar P; Durkan R
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Jun; 21(6):687-691. PubMed ID: 29888712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Partial ceramic crowns: influence of ceramic thickness, preparation design and luting material on fracture resistance and marginal integrity in vitro.
Federlin M; Krifka S; Herpich M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 17555176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Partial ceramic crowns: influence of preparation design and luting material on internal adaptation.
Federlin M; Schmidt S; Hiller KA; Thonemann B; Schmalz G
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):560-70. PubMed ID: 15470879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
