These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18390085)
1. A prospective randomized trial of labor induction with vaginal controlled-release dinoprostone inserts with or without oxytocin and misoprostol+oxytocin. Tanir HM; Sener T; Yildiz C; Kaya M; Kurt I Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2008; 35(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 18390085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Induction of labor with misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes beyond thirty-six weeks' gestation. Wing DA; Paul RH Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul; 179(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 9704771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction. Chang CH; Chang FM J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel. Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low-dose vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone insert for induction of labor beyond 41st week: A randomized trial. De Bonrostro Torralba C; Tejero Cabrejas EL; Envid Lázaro BM; Franco Royo MJ; Roca Arquillué M; Campillos Maza JM Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Jul; 98(7):913-919. PubMed ID: 30723912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction. Moraes Filho OB; Albuquerque RM; Cecatti JG Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1045-52. PubMed ID: 20636243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial. Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of two different doses of misoprostol suppositories with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Khoury AN; Zhou QP; Gorenberg DM; Nies BM; Manley GE; Mecklenburg FE J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Jun; 10(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 11444788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized trial between two active labor management protocols in the presence of an unfavorable cervix. Bolnick JM; Velazquez MD; Gonzalez JL; Rappaport VJ; McIlwain-Dunivan G; Rayburn WF Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 14749647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial. Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized trial. Sanchez-Ramos L; Peterson DE; Delke I; Gaudier FL; Kaunitz AM Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Mar; 91(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 9491868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction. Wing DA; Rahall A; Jones MM; Goodwin TM; Paul RH Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of efficacy and safety of sublingual misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening in prelabour rupture of membranes after 34 weeks of gestation. Jha N; Sagili H; Jayalakshmi D; Lakshminarayanan S Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jan; 291(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 25055933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction. Wing DA; Paul RH Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 175(1):158-64. PubMed ID: 8694043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol plus oxytocin versus oxytocin alone. Balci O; Mahmoud AS; Ozdemir S; Acar A Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 110(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 20347088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Induction of labor in toxemia with misoprostol. Sahin HG; Sahin HA; Kocer M Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2002 Mar; 81(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 11966483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized comparison of one single dose of vaginal 50 microg misoprostol with 3 mg dinoprostone in pre-induction cervical ripening. Charoenkul S; Sripramote M J Med Assoc Thai; 2000 Sep; 83(9):1026-34. PubMed ID: 11075969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial. Pimentel VM; Arabkhazaeli M; Moon JY; Wang A; Kapedani A; Bernstein PS; Tropper PJ Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):614.e1-614.e8. PubMed ID: 29614276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]