These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18390254)

  • 1. Differences in blood pressure values obtained with automated and manual methods in medical inpatients.
    Bern L; Brandt M; Mbelu N; Asonye U; Fisher T; Shaver Y; Serrill C
    Medsurg Nurs; 2007 Dec; 16(6):356-61; quiz 362. PubMed ID: 18390254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of noninvasive blood pressure measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation.
    Anastas ZM; Jimerson E; Garolis S
    J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2008; 23(6):519-24; quiz 525-6. PubMed ID: 18953216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated versus manual blood pressure measurement: a randomized crossover trial.
    Heinemann M; Sellick K; Rickard C; Reynolds P; McGrail M
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2008 Aug; 14(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 18715391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimum frequency of office blood pressure measurement using an automated sphygmomanometer.
    Myers MG; Valdivieso M; Kiss A
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):333-8. PubMed ID: 19020423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical comparison of automatic, noninvasive measurements of blood pressure in the forearm and upper arm with the patient supine or with the head of the bed raised 45 degrees: a follow-up study.
    Schell K; Lyons D; Bradley E; Bucher L; Seckel M; Wakai S; Carson E; Waterhouse J; Chichester M; Bartell D; Foraker T; Simpson EK
    Am J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 15(2):196-205. PubMed ID: 16501139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of automated office blood pressure measurement to reduce the white coat response.
    Myers MG; Valdivieso M; Kiss A
    J Hypertens; 2009 Feb; 27(2):280-6. PubMed ID: 19155785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of the blood pressure measurement.
    Rabbia F; Del Colle S; Testa E; Naso D; Veglio F
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2006 Aug; 54(4):399-416. PubMed ID: 17016412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oscillometric blood pressure measurements: differences between measured and calculated mean arterial pressure.
    Kiers HD; Hofstra JM; Wetzels JF
    Neth J Med; 2008 Dec; 66(11):474-9. PubMed ID: 19075313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of the Artsana CS 410 automated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
    Pini C; Natalizi A; Gerosa PF; Frigerio M; Omboni S; Parati G
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Jun; 13(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 18496297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The validity and reliability of automated and manually measured toe blood pressure in ischemic legs of diabetic patients.
    Påhlsson HI; Lund K; Jörneskog G; Gush R; Wahlberg E
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Nov; 36(5):576-81. PubMed ID: 18801666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consistent relationship between automated office blood pressure recorded in different settings.
    Myers MG; Valdivieso M; Kiss A
    Blood Press Monit; 2009 Jun; 14(3):108-11. PubMed ID: 19417634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of a radial artery compression device with invasive radial artery blood pressure monitoring.
    Fix ML; Goldstein JN; Listwa TM; Nelson SW; Thomas SH
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Aug; 13(4):199-203. PubMed ID: 18635974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Basic principles of noninvasive blood pressure measurement in infants.
    Stebor AD
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2005 Oct; 5(5):252-61; quiz 262-4. PubMed ID: 16202967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of A&D UA-85X device for blood pressure measurement.
    Bonso E; Ragazzo F; Palatini P
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):339-41. PubMed ID: 19020424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the accuracy of the Omron HEM-907 blood pressure device.
    Gurpreet K; Tee GH; Karuthan C
    Med J Malaysia; 2008 Aug; 63(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 19248698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of sphygmomanometers at pharmacies.
    Erdem DG; Erdem E; Dilek M; Aydogdu T; Selim N; Demiray F; Sari A; Akpolat T
    Kidney Blood Press Res; 2009; 32(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 19622898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Home sphygmomanometers: validation versus accuracy.
    Akpolat T; Dilek M; Aydogdu T; Adibelli Z; Erdem DG; Erdem E
    Blood Press Monit; 2009 Feb; 14(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 19190492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of an accurate oscillometric blood pressure device for low resource settings.
    de Greeff A; Nathan H; Stafford N; Liu B; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):342-8. PubMed ID: 19020425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The noninvasive estimation of central aortic blood pressure in patients with aortic stenosis.
    Rajani R; Chowienczyk P; Redwood S; Guilcher A; Chambers JB
    J Hypertens; 2008 Dec; 26(12):2381-8. PubMed ID: 19008716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An optical oscillometric method for neonatal and premature infant blood pressure monitoring.
    Roeder RA; Geddes LA
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2009 Apr; 9(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 19363328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.