These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Predicting wife assault: a critical review and implications for policy and practice. Hilton NZ; Harris GT Trauma Violence Abuse; 2005 Jan; 6(1):3-23. PubMed ID: 15574670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Violent and sexual offences: a validation of the predictive quality of the PCL:SV in Switzerland. Urbaniok F; Endrass J; Rossegger A; Noll T Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17134754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The validity of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) in predicting criminal recidivism. Kröner C; Stadtland C; Eidt M; Nedopil N Crim Behav Ment Health; 2007; 17(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 17295202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The average predictive validity of intimate partner violence risk assessment instruments. Messing JT; Thaller J J Interpers Violence; 2013 May; 28(7):1537-58. PubMed ID: 23262817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physical assault in New Zealand. Goodyear-Smith F; Birks S; Laidlaw T N Z Med J; 1998 Jul; 111(1070):282-3. PubMed ID: 9734533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Strengths and limitations of actuarial prediction of criminal reoffence in a German prison sample: a comparative study of LSI-R, HCR-20 and PCL-R. Dahle KP Int J Law Psychiatry; 2006; 29(5):431-42. PubMed ID: 16780950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing risk markers in intimate partner femicide and severe violence: a new assessment instrument. Echeburúa E; Fernández-Montalvo J; de Corral P; López-Goñi JJ J Interpers Violence; 2009 Jun; 24(6):925-39. PubMed ID: 18544750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Issues regarding the clinical use of the Classification of Violence Risk (COVR) assessment instrument. McCusker PJ Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2007 Dec; 51(6):676-85. PubMed ID: 17615441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting the likelihood of future sexual recidivism: pilot study findings from a California sex offender risk project and cross-validation of the Static-99. Sreenivasan S; Garrick T; Norris R; Cusworth-Walker S; Weinberger LE; Essres G; Turner S; Fain T J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4):454-68. PubMed ID: 18086738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The myth of offenders' deception on self-report measure predicting recidivism: example from the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ). Loza W; Loza-Fanous A; Heseltine K J Interpers Violence; 2007 Jun; 22(6):671-83. PubMed ID: 17515429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START): The case for a new structured professional judgment scheme. Webster CD; Nicholls TL; Martin ML; Desmarais SL; Brink J Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(6):747-66. PubMed ID: 17171764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incremental prediction of intimate partner violence: An examination of three risk measures. Olver ME; Jung S Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):440-453. PubMed ID: 28650186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of discordance among violence and general recidivism risk estimates on predictive accuracy. Mills JF; Kroner DG Crim Behav Ment Health; 2006; 16(3):155-66. PubMed ID: 16795126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]