206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18391567)
1. Sensitivity to interaural level difference and loudness growth with bilateral bimodal stimulation.
Francart T; Brokx J; Wouters J
Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(5):309-19. PubMed ID: 18391567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bilateral cochlear implants controlled by a single speech processor.
Lawson DT; Wilson BS; Zerbi M; van den Honert C; Finley CC; Farmer JC; McElveen JT; Roush PA
Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):758-61. PubMed ID: 9831150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interaural stimulation timing in single sided deaf cochlear implant users.
Zirn S; Arndt S; Aschendorff A; Wesarg T
Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():148-56. PubMed ID: 26302945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of a loudness normalisation strategy for combined cochlear implant and acoustic stimulation.
Francart T; McDermott HJ
Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 294(1-2):114-24. PubMed ID: 23000118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners' Ability to Perceive Minimal Audible Angle Differences.
Zaleski-King A; Goupell MJ; Barac-Cikoja D; Bakke M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Sep; 30(8):659-671. PubMed ID: 30417825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhancement of interaural level differences improves sound localization in bimodal hearing.
Francart T; Lenssen A; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2817-26. PubMed ID: 22087910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Better fitting of cochlear implants: modeling loudness for acoustic and electric stimuli.
McDermott H; Varsavsky A
J Neural Eng; 2009 Dec; 6(6):065007. PubMed ID: 19850972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.
Fu QJ
Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 15811699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Horizontal sound localization in cochlear implant users with a contralateral hearing aid.
Veugen LCE; Hendrikse MME; van Wanrooij MM; Agterberg MJH; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; John van Opstal A
Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():72-82. PubMed ID: 27178443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of interaural differences in envelope shape on the perceived location of sounds (L).
Francart T; Lenssen A; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):611-4. PubMed ID: 22894182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Binaural jitter improves interaural time-difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates.
Laback B; Majdak P
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jan; 105(2):814-7. PubMed ID: 18182489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Amplification of interaural level differences improves sound localization in acoustic simulations of bimodal hearing.
Francart T; Van den Bogaert T; Moonen M; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3209-13. PubMed ID: 20000934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perception of across-frequency interaural level differences.
Francart T; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2826-31. PubMed ID: 18189572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitivity to interaural time differences with combined cochlear implant and acoustic stimulation.
Francart T; Brokx J; Wouters J
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Mar; 10(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 19048344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How much residual hearing is 'useful' for music perception with cochlear implants?
El Fata F; James CJ; Laborde ML; Fraysse B
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():14-21. PubMed ID: 19390171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interaural time and level difference thresholds for acoustically presented signals in post-lingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants using CIS+ processing.
Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 18091105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
