199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18392850)
1. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading: evaluation using prostate cancer tissue microarrays.
Burchardt M; Engers R; Müller M; Burchardt T; Willers R; Epstein JI; Ackermann R; Gabbert HE; de la Taille A; Rubin MA
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2008 Oct; 134(10):1071-8. PubMed ID: 18392850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in Japan and the United States.
Oyama T; Allsbrook WC; Kurokawa K; Matsuda H; Segawa A; Sano T; Suzuki K; Epstein JI
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):1004-10. PubMed ID: 16048389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma using tissue microarrays.
De la Taille A; Viellefond A; Berger N; Boucher E; De Fromont M; Fondimare A; Molinié V; Piron D; Sibony M; Staroz F; Triller M; Peltier E; Thiounn N; Rubin MA
Hum Pathol; 2003 May; 34(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 12792917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists.
Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Amin MB; Bostwick DG; Humphrey PA; Jones EC; Reuter VE; Sakr W; Sesterhenn IA; Troncoso P; Wheeler TM; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 11172298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accurate Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma in prostate needle biopsies by general pathologists.
Renshaw AA; Schultz D; Cote K; Loffredo M; Ziemba DE; D'Amico AV
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Aug; 127(8):1007-8. PubMed ID: 12873176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle core biopsies: a comparison of general and urologic pathologists.
Al-Maghrabi JA; Bakshi NA; Farsi HM
Ann Saudi Med; 2013; 33(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 23458939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.
Egevad L; Ahmad AS; Algaba F; Berney DM; Boccon-Gibod L; Compérat E; Evans AJ; Griffiths D; Grobholz R; Kristiansen G; Langner C; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Moss S; Oliveira P; Vainer B; Varma M; Camparo P
Histopathology; 2013 Jan; 62(2):247-56. PubMed ID: 23240715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Documentation quality of histopathology reports of prostate needle biopsies: a snapshot].
Biesterfeld S
Urologe A; 2014 Nov; 53(11):1644-50. PubMed ID: 25272987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens.
Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer.
Ozkan TA; Eruyar AT; Cebeci OO; Memik O; Ozcan L; Kuskonmaz I
Scand J Urol; 2016 Dec; 50(6):420-424. PubMed ID: 27416104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Classic and International Society of Urological Pathology 2005 Modified Gleason grading using needle biopsies from the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE) trial.
Lucia MS; Bostwick DG; Somerville MC; Fowler IL; Rittmaster RS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Dec; 137(12):1740-6. PubMed ID: 24283854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A web-based tutorial improves practicing pathologists' Gleason grading of images of prostate carcinoma specimens obtained by needle biopsy: validation of a new medical education paradigm.
Kronz JD; Silberman MA; Allsbrook WC; Epstein JI
Cancer; 2000 Oct; 89(8):1818-23. PubMed ID: 11042578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist.
Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 11172299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading in prostate biopsy samples].
Bori R; Salamon F; Móczár C; Cserni G
Orv Hetil; 2013 Aug; 154(31):1219-25. PubMed ID: 23895990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interactive digital slides with heat maps: a novel method to improve the reproducibility of Gleason grading.
Egevad L; Algaba F; Berney DM; Boccon-Gibod L; Compérat E; Evans AJ; Grobholz R; Kristiansen G; Langner C; Lockwood G; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Oliveira P; Schwenkglenks M; Vainer B; Varma M; Verger V; Camparo P
Virchows Arch; 2011 Aug; 459(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 21698392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Artificial intelligence system shows performance at the level of uropathologists for the detection and grading of prostate cancer in core needle biopsy: an independent external validation study.
Jung M; Jin MS; Kim C; Lee C; Nikas IP; Park JH; Ryu HS
Mod Pathol; 2022 Oct; 35(10):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 35487950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of the ISUP e-learning module improves interrater reliability in prostate cancer grading.
Flach RN; Egevad L; Eklund M; van der Kwast TH; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Suelmann BBM; Willemse PM; Meijer RP; van Diest PJ
J Clin Pathol; 2023 Dec; 77(1):22-26. PubMed ID: 36328436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
