156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18392948)
1. Turning failures into successes: a methodological shortcoming in empirical research on surrogate accuracy.
Johansson M; Broström L
Theor Med Bioeth; 2008; 29(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 18392948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Empirical fallacies in the debate on substituted judgment.
Johansson M; Broström L
Health Care Anal; 2014 Mar; 22(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 22367526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Counterfactual reasoning in surrogate decision making -- another look.
Johansson M; Broström L
Bioethics; 2011 Jun; 25(5):244-9. PubMed ID: 19874290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "What the patient would have decided": a fundamental problem with the substituted judgment standard.
Broström L; Johansson M; Nielsen MK
Med Health Care Philos; 2007 Sep; 10(3):265-78. PubMed ID: 17120112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changing the Question.
Brudney D
Hastings Cent Rep; 2019 Mar; 49(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 30998280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient autonomy, assessment of competence and surrogate decision-making: a call for reasonableness in deciding for others.
Baerøe K
Bioethics; 2010 Feb; 24(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 18644014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Claims about surrogate decision-making accuracy require empirical evidence.
Feltz A; Abt T
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):41-3. PubMed ID: 22974033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Surrogate decision makers: what if a surrogate cannot decide?
Anderson J
JAAPA; 2012 Feb; 25(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 22416559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Surrogate consent to non-beneficial research: erring on the right side when substituted judgments may be inaccurate.
Johansson M; Broström L
Theor Med Bioeth; 2016 Apr; 37(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 27130296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Substituted consent: from lunatics to corpses.
Mendelson D
J Law Med; 2007 May; 14(4):449-62. PubMed ID: 17571779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward a Psychology of Surrogate Decision Making.
Tunney RJ; Ziegler FV
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Nov; 10(6):880-5. PubMed ID: 26581742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surrogates and extra-familial interests.
Baergen R; Woodhouse W
J Clin Ethics; 2013; 24(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 24597420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incompetent patients, substitute decision making, and quality of life: some ethical considerations.
Kluge EH
Medscape J Med; 2008; 10(10):237. PubMed ID: 19099031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Facebook can improve surrogate decision making.
Pope TM
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):43-5. PubMed ID: 22974034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Surrogate decision making 2.0: digital evidence as clinical testimony.
Wahlert L
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):34-6. PubMed ID: 22974029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Considerations in surrogate decision making in the internet age.
Tsai NT
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):51. PubMed ID: 22974038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Are we prepared for surrogate decision making in the internet age?
Moore JA; Gallagher CM
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):47-9. PubMed ID: 22974036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A disability response to surrogate decision making in the internet age.
Burke TB
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):36-7. PubMed ID: 22974030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Substituted judgments in the absence of surrogates.
Sadovnikoff N; Jurchak M
Crit Care Med; 2007 Oct; 35(10):2467-8. PubMed ID: 17885404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethical understandings of proxy decision making for research involving adults lacking capacity: A systematic review (framework synthesis) of empirical research.
Shepherd V; Hood K; Sheehan M; Griffith R; Jordan A; Wood F
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(4):267-286. PubMed ID: 30321110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
