These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18393784)

  • 1. A review of methods for ensuring the comparability of comparison groups in randomized clinical trials.
    Berger VW
    Rev Recent Clin Trials; 2006 Jan; 1(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 18393784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ensuring the comparability of comparison groups: is randomization enough?
    Berger VW; Weinstein S
    Control Clin Trials; 2004 Oct; 25(5):515-24. PubMed ID: 15465620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking.
    Viera AJ; Bangdiwala SI
    Fam Med; 2007 Feb; 39(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 17273956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomization in clinical trials in orthodontics: its significance in research design and methods to achieve it.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):684-90. PubMed ID: 21320892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantifying the magnitude of baseline covariate imbalances resulting from selection bias in randomized clinical trials.
    Berger VW
    Biom J; 2005 Apr; 47(2):119-27; discussion 128-39. PubMed ID: 16389910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomization in controlled clinical trials: why the flip of a coin is so important.
    Blume J; Peipert JF
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2004 Aug; 11(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 15559341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reverse propensity score to detect selection bias and correct for baseline imbalances.
    Berger VW
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2777-87. PubMed ID: 15981305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials.
    Kunz R; Vist G; Oxman AD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; (2):MR000012. PubMed ID: 17443633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.
    Modi N
    Neonatology; 2014; 105(4):350-1. PubMed ID: 24931328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The pursuit of balance: An overview of covariate-adaptive randomization techniques in clinical trials.
    Lin Y; Zhu M; Su Z
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):21-5. PubMed ID: 26244705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Poor reporting quality of key Randomization and Allocation Concealment details is still prevalent among published RCTs in 2011: a review.
    Clark L; Schmidt U; Tharmanathan P; Adamson J; Hewitt C; Torgerson D
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):703-7. PubMed ID: 23648066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimal sufficient balance-a new strategy to balance baseline covariates and preserve randomness of treatment allocation.
    Zhao W; Hill MD; Palesch Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):989-1002. PubMed ID: 22287602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of constrained randomization for the design and analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Li F; Turner EL; Heagerty PJ; Murray DM; Vollmer WM; DeLong ER
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(24):3791-3806. PubMed ID: 28786223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of Selection Bias on Treatment Effect Size Estimates in Randomized Trials of Oral Health Interventions: A Meta-epidemiological Study.
    Saltaji H; Armijo-Olivo S; Cummings GG; Amin M; da Costa BR; Flores-Mir C
    J Dent Res; 2018 Jan; 97(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 28813182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use and reporting of restricted randomization: a review.
    Higham R; Tharmanathan P; Birks Y
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Dec; 21(6):1205-11. PubMed ID: 26200039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Control of selection bias in parallel-group controlled clinical trials in dogs and cats: 97 trials (2000-2005).
    Brown DC
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2006 Sep; 229(6):990-3. PubMed ID: 16978121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomization procedures in orthopaedic trials.
    Randelli P; Arrigoni P; Lubowitz JH; Cabitza P; Denti M
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Jul; 24(7):834-8. PubMed ID: 18589273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorders: a systematic review.
    Strech D; Soltmann B; Weikert B; Bauer M; Pfennig A
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2011 Sep; 72(9):1214-21. PubMed ID: 21294992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomization methods in emergency setting trials: a descriptive review.
    Corbett MS; Moe-Byrne T; Oddie S; McGuire W
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Mar; 7(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 26333419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.