These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18393936)

  • 1. Response pattern asymmetry of binocular vision vertical fusion amplitudes in a normal population.
    Kim JK; Hayden AM; Sadun EA; Sebag J; Sadun AA
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2008; 23(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18393936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Capture of visual direction in dynamic vergence is reduced with flashed monocular lines.
    Jaschinski W; Jainta S; Schürer M
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2608-14. PubMed ID: 16530245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in Listing's plane after sustained vertical fusion.
    Steffen H; Walker M; Zee DS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Mar; 43(3):668-72. PubMed ID: 11867582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variation of binocular-vertical fusion amplitude with convergence.
    Bharadwaj SR; Hoenig MP; Sivaramakrishnan VC; Karthikeyan B; Simonian D; Mau K; Rastani S; Schor CM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 48(4):1592-600. PubMed ID: 17389488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A VEP measure of the binocular fusion of horizontal and vertical disparities.
    Hale J; Harrad RA; McKee SP; Pettet MW; Norcia AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 May; 46(5):1786-90. PubMed ID: 15851583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of horizontal vergence on the motor and sensory components of vertical fusion.
    Hara N; Steffen H; Roberts DC; Zee DS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 Nov; 39(12):2268-76. PubMed ID: 9804135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Target Properties Effects on Central versus Peripheral Vertical Fusion Interaction Tested on a 3D Platform.
    Zhang D; Neveu P; Fattakhova Y; Ferragut S; Lamard M; Cochener B; de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye JL
    Curr Eye Res; 2017 Mar; 42(3):476-483. PubMed ID: 27419270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aging does not affect the accuracy of vertical saccades nor the quality of their binocular coordination: a study of a special elderly group.
    Yang Q; Kapoula Z
    Neurobiol Aging; 2008 Apr; 29(4):622-38. PubMed ID: 17157416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vertical fusional amplitudes in patients wearing vertical anisometropic correction.
    Griebel SR; Riemann CD; Szymusiak EL; Kosmorsky GS
    Ophthalmology; 1999 Sep; 106(9):1731-3. PubMed ID: 10485542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Directional asymmetry during combined saccade-vergence movements.
    Kumar AN; Han Y; Dell'Osso LF; Durand DM; Leigh RJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 May; 93(5):2797-808. PubMed ID: 15625096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vertical imbalance induced by prism-ballasted soft toric contact lenses fitted unilaterally.
    Nilsson M; Stevenson SB; Leach N; Bergmanson JP; Brautaset RL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Mar; 28(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 18339047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relation between fixation disparity and the asymmetry between convergent and divergent disparity step responses.
    Jaschinski W; Svede A; Jainta S
    Vision Res; 2008 Jan; 48(2):253-63. PubMed ID: 18164741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The prism that aligns fixation disparity does not predict the self-selected prism.
    Otto JM; Bach M; Kommerell G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Nov; 28(6):550-7. PubMed ID: 19076557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The dependence of the range of fusion on some selected functions of the visual system. Part II: Accommodation and dominance].
    Adamek B; Karczewicz D
    Klin Oczna; 2006; 108(4-6):167-9. PubMed ID: 17019986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impaired vertical phoria adaptation in patients with cerebellar dysfunction.
    Kono R; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H; Kashihara K; Shiro Y
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Mar; 43(3):673-8. PubMed ID: 11867583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial scaling of the binocular capture effect.
    Raghunandan A; Anderson CS; Saladin JJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 19182700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neuromuscular plasticity and rehabilitation of the ocular near response.
    Schor CM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jul; 86(7):E788-802. PubMed ID: 19543139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Local binocular fusion is involved in global binocular rivalry.
    Takase S; Yukumatsu S; Bingushi K
    Vision Res; 2008 Aug; 48(17):1798-803. PubMed ID: 18585751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vernier acuity for stereodisparate objects and ocular prevalence.
    Heinrich SP; Kromeier M; Bach M; Kommerell G
    Vision Res; 2005 May; 45(10):1321-8. PubMed ID: 15733964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Mallett Fixation Disparity Test: influence of test instructions and relationship with symptoms.
    Karania R; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Sep; 26(5):507-22. PubMed ID: 16918777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.