These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18394536)

  • 1. Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects.
    Golder S; Loke Y; McIntosh HM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 May; 61(5):440-8. PubMed ID: 18394536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions.
    Golder S; McIntosh HM; Loke Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 May; 6():22. PubMed ID: 16681854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?
    Lefebvre C; Glanville J; Wieland LS; Coles B; Weightman AL
    Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():78. PubMed ID: 24066664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews.
    Golder S; Loke YK; Zorzela L
    Health Info Libr J; 2014 Jun; 31(2):92-105. PubMed ID: 24754741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some improvements are apparent in identifying adverse effects in systematic reviews from 1994 to 2011.
    Golder S; Loke YK; Zorzela L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Mar; 66(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 23347849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
    Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Search strategies to identify information on adverse effects: a systematic review.
    Golder S; Loke Y
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2009 Apr; 97(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 19404498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of search and selection methods used in dental systematic reviews published in English.
    Major MP; Major PW; Flores-Mir C
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Sep; 137(9):1252-7. PubMed ID: 16946429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews.
    Sampson M; McGowan J; Tetzlaff J; Cogo E; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):748-54. PubMed ID: 18586178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simplified search strategy for identifying randomised controlled trials for systematic reviews of health care interventions: a comparison with more exhaustive strategies.
    Royle P; Waugh N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Jul; 5():23. PubMed ID: 16042789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "Brimful of STARLITE": toward standards for reporting literature searches.
    Booth A
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2006 Oct; 94(4):421-9, e205. PubMed ID: 17082834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies.
    Whiting P; Westwood M; Burke M; Sterne J; Glanville J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):357-364. PubMed ID: 18313560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chapter 4: effective search strategies for systematic reviews of medical tests.
    Relevo R
    J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S28-32. PubMed ID: 22648672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic reviews of adverse effects of drug interventions: a survey of their conduct and reporting quality.
    Cornelius VR; Perrio MJ; Shakir SA; Smith LA
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2009 Dec; 18(12):1223-31. PubMed ID: 19757414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study.
    Bramer WM; Rethlefsen ML; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
    Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):245. PubMed ID: 29208034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies.
    Sampson M; McGowan J; Cogo E; Grimshaw J; Moher D; Lefebvre C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Sep; 62(9):944-52. PubMed ID: 19230612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heterogeneity in search strategies among Cochrane acupuncture reviews: is there room for improvement?
    Lui S; Smith EJ; Terplan M
    Acupunct Med; 2010 Sep; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 20615852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Information retrieval for systematic reviews in food and feed topics: A narrative review.
    Wood H; O'Connor A; Sargeant J; Glanville J
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Dec; 9(4):527-539. PubMed ID: 29316306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A review of the reporting of web searching to identify studies for Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Briscoe S
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 29065246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Yoshii A; Plaut DA; McGraw KA; Anderson MJ; Wellik KE
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2009 Jan; 97(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 19158999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.