BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18394536)

  • 1. Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects.
    Golder S; Loke Y; McIntosh HM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 May; 61(5):440-8. PubMed ID: 18394536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions.
    Golder S; McIntosh HM; Loke Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 May; 6():22. PubMed ID: 16681854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?
    Lefebvre C; Glanville J; Wieland LS; Coles B; Weightman AL
    Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():78. PubMed ID: 24066664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews.
    Golder S; Loke YK; Zorzela L
    Health Info Libr J; 2014 Jun; 31(2):92-105. PubMed ID: 24754741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some improvements are apparent in identifying adverse effects in systematic reviews from 1994 to 2011.
    Golder S; Loke YK; Zorzela L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Mar; 66(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 23347849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
    Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Search strategies to identify information on adverse effects: a systematic review.
    Golder S; Loke Y
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2009 Apr; 97(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 19404498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of search and selection methods used in dental systematic reviews published in English.
    Major MP; Major PW; Flores-Mir C
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Sep; 137(9):1252-7. PubMed ID: 16946429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews.
    Sampson M; McGowan J; Tetzlaff J; Cogo E; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):748-54. PubMed ID: 18586178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simplified search strategy for identifying randomised controlled trials for systematic reviews of health care interventions: a comparison with more exhaustive strategies.
    Royle P; Waugh N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Jul; 5():23. PubMed ID: 16042789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "Brimful of STARLITE": toward standards for reporting literature searches.
    Booth A
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2006 Oct; 94(4):421-9, e205. PubMed ID: 17082834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies.
    Whiting P; Westwood M; Burke M; Sterne J; Glanville J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):357-364. PubMed ID: 18313560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chapter 4: effective search strategies for systematic reviews of medical tests.
    Relevo R
    J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S28-32. PubMed ID: 22648672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic reviews of adverse effects of drug interventions: a survey of their conduct and reporting quality.
    Cornelius VR; Perrio MJ; Shakir SA; Smith LA
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2009 Dec; 18(12):1223-31. PubMed ID: 19757414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study.
    Bramer WM; Rethlefsen ML; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
    Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):245. PubMed ID: 29208034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies.
    Sampson M; McGowan J; Cogo E; Grimshaw J; Moher D; Lefebvre C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Sep; 62(9):944-52. PubMed ID: 19230612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heterogeneity in search strategies among Cochrane acupuncture reviews: is there room for improvement?
    Lui S; Smith EJ; Terplan M
    Acupunct Med; 2010 Sep; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 20615852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Information retrieval for systematic reviews in food and feed topics: A narrative review.
    Wood H; O'Connor A; Sargeant J; Glanville J
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Dec; 9(4):527-539. PubMed ID: 29316306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A review of the reporting of web searching to identify studies for Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Briscoe S
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 29065246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Yoshii A; Plaut DA; McGraw KA; Anderson MJ; Wellik KE
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2009 Jan; 97(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 19158999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.