BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18394537)

  • 1. Systematic reviews and original articles differ in relevance, novelty, and use in an evidence-based service for physicians: PLUS project.
    McKinlay RJ; Cotoi C; Wilczynski NL; Haynes RB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 May; 61(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 18394537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Second-order peer review of the medical literature for clinical practitioners.
    Haynes RB; Cotoi C; Holland J; Walters L; Wilczynski N; Jedraszewski D; McKinlay J; Parrish R; McKibbon KA;
    JAMA; 2006 Apr; 295(15):1801-8. PubMed ID: 16622142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts.
    Montori VM; Wilczynski NL; Morgan D; Haynes RB;
    BMC Med; 2003 Nov; 1():2. PubMed ID: 14633274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method for defining a journal subset for a clinical discipline using the bibliographies of systematic reviews.
    Wilczynski NL; Garg AX; Haynes B;
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 1):721-4. PubMed ID: 17911811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Systematic reviews on infectious diseases. The Cochrane Collaboration].
    Bonfill X; Martí J
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1999; 17 Suppl 2():15-21. PubMed ID: 10605185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissemination of research in clinical nursing journals.
    Oermann MH; Nordstrom CK; Wilmes NA; Denison D; Webb SA; Featherston DE; Bednarz H; Striz P; Blair DA; Kowalewski K
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Jan; 17(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 18171391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Increased number of systematic reviews in the Netherlands in the period 1991-2000].
    Grootens KP; Assendelft WJ; Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Nov; 147(45):2226-30. PubMed ID: 14640061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology.
    Collier A; Heilig L; Schilling L; Williams H; Dellavalle RP
    Br J Dermatol; 2006 Dec; 155(6):1230-5. PubMed ID: 17107394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated?
    French SD; McDonald S; McKenzie JE; Green SE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Oct; 5():33. PubMed ID: 16225692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using online databases to find journal articles on injury prevention and safety promotion research: key journals and the databases that index them.
    Lawrence DW; Laflamme L
    Inj Prev; 2008 Apr; 14(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 18388228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How evidence-based are publications in clinical ophthalmic journals?
    Lai TY; Leung GM; Wong VW; Lam RF; Cheng AC; Lam DS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 May; 47(5):1831-8. PubMed ID: 16638988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.
    Moseley AM; Elkins MR; Herbert RD; Maher CG; Sherrington C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1021-30. PubMed ID: 19282144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic reviews for evidence-based management: how to find them and what to do with them.
    Chan KS; Morton SC; Shekelle PG
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Nov; 10(11 Pt 1):806-12. PubMed ID: 15623270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment.
    de Craen AJ; van Vliet HA; Helmerhorst FM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):311-3. PubMed ID: 15718121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to write an evidence-based clinical review article.
    Siwek J; Gourlay ML; Slawson DC; Shaughnessy AF
    Am Fam Physician; 2002 Jan; 65(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 11820489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does anybody read "evidence-based" articles?
    Loke YK; Derry S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Jul; 3():14. PubMed ID: 12892569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EMBASE search strategies achieved high sensitivity and specificity for retrieving methodologically sound systematic reviews.
    Wilczynski NL; Haynes RB;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 60(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 17161751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evidence for nursing interventions in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
    Mistiaen P; Poot E; Hickox S; Wagner C
    Nurse Res; 2004; 12(2):71-80. PubMed ID: 15636007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.