These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Reasoning with conditionals: a test of formal models of four theories. Oberauer K Cogn Psychol; 2006 Nov; 53(3):238-83. PubMed ID: 16729993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reasoning about the relations between relations. Goodwin GP; Johnson-Laird PN Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jun; 59(6):1047-69. PubMed ID: 16885143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are conjunctive inferences easier than disjunctive inferences? A comparison of rules and models. García-Madruga JA; Moreno S; Carriedo N; Gutiérrez F; Johnson-Laird PN Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 May; 54(2):613-32. PubMed ID: 11394065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. From models to rules: mechanization of reasoning as a way to cope with cognitive overloading in combinatorial problems. Cherubini P; Mazzocco A Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 Jul; 116(3):223-43. PubMed ID: 15222968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of cues to differential absolute size in children's transitive inferences. Wright BC; Dowker AD J Exp Child Psychol; 2002 Mar; 81(3):249-75. PubMed ID: 11884090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Illusory inferences: a novel class of erroneous deductions. Johnson-Laird PN; Savary F Cognition; 1999 Jul; 71(3):191-229. PubMed ID: 10476604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Syntactic priming in 3- and 4-year-old children: evidence for abstract representations of transitive and dative forms. Shimpi PM; Gámez PB; Huttenlocher J; Vasilyeva M Dev Psychol; 2007 Nov; 43(6):1334-46. PubMed ID: 18020815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consequential conditionals: invited and suppressed inferences from valued outcomes. Bonnefon JF; Hilton DJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jan; 30(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 14736294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pinyon jays use transitive inference to predict social dominance. Paz-Y-Miño C G; Bond AB; Kamil AC; Balda RP Nature; 2004 Aug; 430(7001):778-81. PubMed ID: 15306809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reasoning with premises that are not empirically true: evidence for the role of inhibition and retrieval. Simoneau M; Markovits H Dev Psychol; 2003 Nov; 39(6):964-75. PubMed ID: 14584978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Naïve deontics: a theory of meaning, representation, and reasoning. Bucciarelli M; Johnson-Laird PN Cogn Psychol; 2005 Mar; 50(2):159-93. PubMed ID: 15680143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Illusions in quantified reasoning: how to make the impossible seem possible, and vice versa. Yang Y; Johnson-Laird PN Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):452-65. PubMed ID: 10881562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Thematic role properties of subjects and objects. Kako E Cognition; 2006 Aug; 101(1):1-42. PubMed ID: 16289069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reasoning counterfactually: making inferences about things that didn't happen. Thompson VA; Byrne RM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1154-70. PubMed ID: 12450339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reconnecting interpretation to reasoning through individual differences. Stenning K; Cox R Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Aug; 59(8):1454-83. PubMed ID: 16846971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]