141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18395358)
1. Comparison of 2D radiographic images and 3D cone beam computed tomography for positioning head-and-neck radiotherapy patients.
Li H; Zhu XR; Zhang L; Dong L; Tung S; Ahamad A; Chao KS; Morrison WH; Rosenthal DI; Schwartz DL; Mohan R; Garden AS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jul; 71(3):916-25. PubMed ID: 18395358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On-board patient positioning for head-and-neck IMRT: comparing digital tomosynthesis to kilovoltage radiography and cone-beam computed tomography.
Wu QJ; Godfrey DJ; Wang Z; Zhang J; Zhou S; Yoo S; Brizel DM; Yin FF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Oct; 69(2):598-606. PubMed ID: 17869673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Linac-based on-board imaging feasibility and the dosimetric consequences of head roll in head-and-neck IMRT plans.
Kim GY; Pawlicki T; Le QT; Luxton G
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 18262130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of setup accuracy of optical surface image versus orthogonal x-ray images for VMAT of the left breast using deep-inspiration breath-hold.
Lu W; Hong LX; Yamada N; Berry SL; Song Y; Choi W; Cerviño LI; Tang X; Mechalakos JG; Romesser PB; Powell S; Li G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 24(12):e14117. PubMed ID: 37535396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Set-up errors in head and neck cancer patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy: Quantitative comparison between three-dimensional cone-beam CT and two-dimensional kilovoltage images.
Ciardo D; Alterio D; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Riboldi M; Zerini D; Santoro L; Preve E; Rondi E; Comi S; Serafini F; Laudati A; Ansarin M; Preda L; Baroni G; Orecchia R
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1015-1021. PubMed ID: 26459318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accurate positioning for head and neck cancer patients using 2D and 3D image guidance.
Kang H; Lovelock DM; Yorke ED; Kriminski S; Lee N; Amols HI
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 12(1):3270. PubMed ID: 21330971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated 2D-3D registration of a radiograph and a cone beam CT using line-segment enhancement.
Munbodh R; Jaffray DA; Moseley DJ; Chen Z; Knisely JP; Cathier P; Duncan JS
Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1398-411. PubMed ID: 16752576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repositioning accuracy of two different mask systems-3D revisited: comparison using true 3D/3D matching with cone-beam CT.
Boda-Heggemann J; Walter C; Rahn A; Wertz H; Loeb I; Lohr F; Wenz F
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Dec; 66(5):1568-75. PubMed ID: 17126213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of surface-guided patient setup for conventional radiotherapy of brain and nasopharynx cancer.
Lee SK; Huang S; Zhang L; Ballangrud AM; Aristophanous M; Cervino Arriba LI; Li G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 May; 22(5):48-57. PubMed ID: 33792186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is ExacTrac x-ray system an alternative to CBCT for positioning patients with head and neck cancers?
Clemente S; Chiumento C; Fiorentino A; Simeon V; Cozzolino M; Oliviero C; Califano G; Caivano R; Fusco V
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111725. PubMed ID: 24320433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cone-beam CT assessment of interfraction and intrafraction setup error of two head-and-neck cancer thermoplastic masks.
Velec M; Waldron JN; O'Sullivan B; Bayley A; Cummings B; Kim JJ; Ringash J; Breen SL; Lockwood GA; Dawson LA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Mar; 76(3):949-55. PubMed ID: 20056344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Local interfractional setup reproducibility for 2 individual head and neck supports in head and neck cancer patients.
van Beek S; Mencarelli A; Remeijer P; Sonke JJ; Rasch CR
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2014; 4(6):448-54. PubMed ID: 25407868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Positioning reproducibility with and without rotational corrections for 2 head and neck immobilization systems.
Courneyea L; Mullins J; Howard M; Foote R; Garces Y; Ma D; Beltran C; Brinkmann D; Pafundi D
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(6):e575-81. PubMed ID: 26169225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of mega-voltage cone-beam computed tomography prostate localization with online ultrasound and fiducial markers methods.
Gayou O; Miften M
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):531-8. PubMed ID: 18383674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the accuracy of a 3D surface imaging system for patient setup in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.
Gopan O; Wu Q
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Oct; 84(2):547-52. PubMed ID: 22365627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and feasibility of cone-beam computed tomography for stereotactic radiosurgery setup.
Chang J; Yenice KM; Narayana A; Gutin PH
Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):2077-84. PubMed ID: 17654911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of surface registration compared to conventional volumetric registration in patient positioning for head-and-neck radiotherapy: a simulation study using patient data.
Kim Y; Li R; Na YH; Lee R; Xing L
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121701. PubMed ID: 25471948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of setup accuracy of three different thermoplastic masks for the treatment of brain and head and neck tumors.
Gilbeau L; Octave-Prignot M; Loncol T; Renard L; Scalliet P; Grégoire V
Radiother Oncol; 2001 Feb; 58(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 11166866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A study on the necessity of kV-CBCT imaging compared to kV-orthogonal portal imaging based on setup errors: considering other socioeconomical factors.
Gurjar OP; Mishra SP; Bhandari V; Pathak P; Pant S; Patel P
J Cancer Res Ther; 2014; 10(3):583-6. PubMed ID: 25313743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of vacuum bag fixation and Orfit rack with thermoplastic membrane fixation for image-guided cervical cancer radiotherapy].
Li YB; Wang YL; Zhuo YH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 39(6):467-470. PubMed ID: 28635238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
