These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18395767)

  • 21. The role of search difficulty in intertrial feature priming.
    Lamy D; Zivony A; Yashar A
    Vision Res; 2011 Oct; 51(19):2099-109. PubMed ID: 21784093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task.
    Kristjánsson A
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2554-70. PubMed ID: 16527323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.
    Schubö A; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of search mode and intertrial priming on singleton search.
    Lamy D; Carmel T; Egeth HE; Leber AB
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Aug; 68(6):919-32. PubMed ID: 17153188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of task relevance and stimulus-driven salience in feature-search mode.
    Lamy D; Leber A; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1019-31. PubMed ID: 15584812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An inter-item similarity model unifying feature and conjunction search.
    Phillips S; Takeda Y; Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3867-80. PubMed ID: 16920177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Feature priming and the capture of visual attention: linking two ambiguity resolution hypotheses.
    Hickey C; Olivers C; Meeter M; Theeuwes J
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1370():175-84. PubMed ID: 21078309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Priming resolves perceptual ambiguity in visual search: evidence from behaviour and electrophysiology.
    Olivers CN; Hickey C
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1362-71. PubMed ID: 19962396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Target uncertainty does not lead to more distraction by singletons: intertrial priming does.
    Pinto Y; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Nov; 67(8):1354-61. PubMed ID: 16555587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of target and distractor heterogeneity on search for a color target.
    Nagy AL; Neriani KE; Young TL
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1885-99. PubMed ID: 15797778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bottom-up guidance in visual search for conjunctions.
    Proulx MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 17311478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Inter-trial inhibition of attention to features is modulated by task relevance.
    Levinthal BR; Lleras A
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):12.1-15. PubMed ID: 19146296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Feature singletons attract spatial attention independently of feature priming.
    Yashar A; White AL; Fang W; Carrasco M
    J Vis; 2017 Aug; 17(9):7. PubMed ID: 28800369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search.
    Burnham BR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 20510910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Location and color biases have different influences on selective attention.
    Fecteau JH; Korjoukov I; Roelfsema PR
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(9):996-1005. PubMed ID: 19324066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Saccade target selection: Do distractors affect saccade accuracy?
    Findlay JM; Blythe HI
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1267-74. PubMed ID: 18691610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Saccadic selectivity in complex visual search displays.
    Pomplun M
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1886-900. PubMed ID: 16445960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Auditory attentional capture: effects of singleton distractor sounds.
    Dalton P; Lavie N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 14769076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Repetition of distractor sets improves visual search performance in hemispatial neglect.
    Saevarsson S; Jóelsdóttir S; Hjaltason H; Kristjánsson A
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Mar; 46(4):1161-9. PubMed ID: 18068736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.