294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18395802)
1. Cochlear implantation in individuals with Usher type 1 syndrome.
Liu XZ; Angeli SI; Rajput K; Yan D; Hodges AV; Eshraghi A; Telischi FF; Balkany TJ
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 72(6):841-7. PubMed ID: 18395802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Usher type I syndrome in children: genotype/phenotype correlation and cochlear implant benefits].
Blanchet C; Roux AF; Hamel C; Ben Salah S; Artières F; Faugère V; Uziel A; Mondain M
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2007; 128(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 18323324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mutation profile of the MYO7A gene in Spanish patients with Usher syndrome type I.
Jaijo T; Aller E; Oltra S; Beneyto M; Nájera C; Ayuso C; Baiget M; Carballo M; Antiñolo G; Valverde D; Moreno F; Vilela C; Perez-Garrigues H; Navea A; Millán JM
Hum Mutat; 2006 Mar; 27(3):290-1. PubMed ID: 16470552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Molecular basis of human Usher syndrome: deciphering the meshes of the Usher protein network provides insights into the pathomechanisms of the Usher disease.
Reiners J; Nagel-Wolfrum K; Jürgens K; Märker T; Wolfrum U
Exp Eye Res; 2006 Jul; 83(1):97-119. PubMed ID: 16545802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Audiologic performance and benefit of cochlear implantation in Usher syndrome type I.
Pennings RJ; Damen GW; Snik AF; Hoefsloot L; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
Laryngoscope; 2006 May; 116(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 16652077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic analysis of Tunisian families with Usher syndrome type 1: toward improving early molecular diagnosis.
Ben-Rebeh I; Grati M; Bonnet C; Bouassida W; Hadjamor I; Ayadi H; Ghorbel A; Petit C; Masmoudi S
Mol Vis; 2016; 22():827-35. PubMed ID: 27440999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survey of the frequency of USH1 gene mutations in a cohort of Usher patients shows the importance of cadherin 23 and protocadherin 15 genes and establishes a detection rate of above 90%.
Roux AF; Faugère V; Le Guédard S; Pallares-Ruiz N; Vielle A; Chambert S; Marlin S; Hamel C; Gilbert B; Malcolm S; Claustres M;
J Med Genet; 2006 Sep; 43(9):763-8. PubMed ID: 16679490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identification and in vitro expression of novel CDH23 mutations of patients with Usher syndrome type 1D.
von Brederlow B; Bolz H; Janecke A; La O Cabrera A; Rudolph G; Lorenz B; Schwinger E; Gal A
Hum Mutat; 2002 Mar; 19(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 11857743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hearing rehabilitation in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: cochlear versus auditory brainstem implantation.
Vincenti V; Pasanisi E; Guida M; Di Trapani G; Sanna M
Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 18259080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Novel mutations in MYO7A and USH2A in Usher syndrome.
Maubaret C; Griffoin JM; Arnaud B; Hamel C
Ophthalmic Genet; 2005 Mar; 26(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 15823922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cochlear implant outcomes in adults and adolescents with early-onset hearing loss.
Caposecco A; Hickson L; Pedley K
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):209-20. PubMed ID: 21934504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Novel mutations in the USH1C gene in Usher syndrome patients.
Aparisi MJ; García-García G; Jaijo T; Rodrigo R; Graziano C; Seri M; Simsek T; Simsek E; Bernal S; Baiget M; Pérez-Garrigues H; Aller E; Millán JM
Mol Vis; 2010 Dec; 16():2948-54. PubMed ID: 21203349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech perception in children after cochlear implantation.
O'Donoghue GM; Nikolopoulos TP; Archbold SM; Tait M
Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):762-7. PubMed ID: 9831151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation.
Geers AE
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):634-8. PubMed ID: 15148189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech recognition and communication outcomes with cochlear implantation in Usher syndrome type 3.
Pietola L; Aarnisalo AA; Abdel-Rahman A; Västinsalo H; Isosomppi J; Löppönen H; Kentala E; Johansson R; Valtonen H; Vasama JP; Sankila EM; Jero J
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jan; 33(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 22143301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early prelingual auditory development and speech perception at 1-year follow-up in Mandarin-speaking children after cochlear implantation.
Zheng Y; Soli SD; Tao Y; Xu K; Meng Z; Li G; Wang K; Zheng H
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Nov; 75(11):1418-26. PubMed ID: 21893351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of life and cochlear implantation in Usher syndrome type I.
Damen GW; Pennings RJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA
Laryngoscope; 2006 May; 116(5):723-8. PubMed ID: 16652078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is psychological status a determinant of speech perception outcomes in highly selected good adolescent cochlear implant users?
Yucel E; Sennaroglu G
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 71(9):1415-22. PubMed ID: 17586056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Usher syndrome: characteristics and outcomes of pediatric cochlear implant recipients.
Jatana KR; Thomas D; Weber L; Mets MB; Silverman JB; Young NM
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):484-9. PubMed ID: 23442567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
