241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18395811)
1. Dose-volume and biological-model based comparison between helical tomotherapy and (inverse-planned) IMAT for prostate tumours.
Iori M; Cattaneo GM; Cagni E; Fiorino C; Borasi G; Riccardo C; Iotti C; Fazio F; Nahum AE
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 18395811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of plan quality provided by intensity-modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy.
Cao D; Holmes TW; Afghan MK; Shepard DM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Sep; 69(1):240-50. PubMed ID: 17707278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sparing the penile bulb in the radical irradiation of clinically localised prostate carcinoma: A comparison between MRI and CT prostatic apex definition in 3DCRT, Linac-IMRT and Helical Tomotherapy.
Perna L; Fiorino C; Cozzarini C; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; De Cobelli F; Mangili P; Di Muzio N; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 19410316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Helical tomotherapy versus single-arc intensity-modulated arc therapy: a collaborative dosimetric comparison between two institutions.
Rong Y; Tang G; Welsh JS; Mohiuddin MM; Paliwal B; Yu CX
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Sep; 81(1):284-96. PubMed ID: 21236598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Helical tomotherapy to LINAC plan conversion utilizing RayStation Fallback planning.
Zhang X; Penagaricano J; Narayanasamy G; Corry P; Liu T; Sanjay M; Paudel N; Morrill S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):178-185. PubMed ID: 28291935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Helical tomotherapy vs. intensity-modulated proton therapy for whole pelvis irradiation in high-risk prostate cancer patients: dosimetric, normal tissue complication probability, and generalized equivalent uniform dose analysis.
Widesott L; Pierelli A; Fiorino C; Lomax AJ; Amichetti M; Cozzarini C; Soukup M; Schneider R; Hug E; Di Muzio N; Calandrino R; Schwarz M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Aug; 80(5):1589-600. PubMed ID: 21167651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment planning strategy for whole-brain radiotherapy with hippocampal sparing and simultaneous integrated boost for multiple brain metastases using intensity-modulated arc therapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; McClinton C; Shen X; Lominska C; Saleh H; Badkul R; Jiang H; Mitchell M; Wang F
Med Dosim; 2016 Winter; 41(4):315-322. PubMed ID: 27692518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy, RapidArc, and a novel IMRT & Arc technique for esophageal carcinoma.
Martin S; Chen JZ; Rashid Dar A; Yartsev S
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Dec; 101(3):431-7. PubMed ID: 21962823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Helical tomotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: dosimetric comparison with linear accelerator-based step-and-shoot IMRT.
Murthy V; Master Z; Gupta T; Ghosh-Laskar S; Budrukkar A; Phurailatpam R; Agarwal J
J Cancer Res Ther; 2010; 6(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 20622367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of leaf motion constraints on IMAT plan quality, deliver accuracy, and efficiency.
Chen F; Rao M; Ye JS; Shepard DM; Cao D
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6106-18. PubMed ID: 22047375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Similarities between static and rotational intensity-modulated plans.
Wu QJ; Yin FF; McMahon R; Zhu X; Das SK
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 55(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 19949257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is IMAT the ultimate evolution of conformal radiotherapy? Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for oropharyngeal cancer in a planning study.
Servagi Vernat S; Ali D; Puyraveau M; Viard R; Lisbona A; Fenoglietto P; Bedos L; Makovicka L; Giraud P
Phys Med; 2014 May; 30(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 23948367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT radiation modalities in treating brain and cranio-spinal tumors.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Delichas MG; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Feb; 8(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 19166237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incorporating geometric ray tracing to generate initial conditions for intensity modulated arc therapy optimization.
Oliver M; Gladwish A; Craig J; Chen J; Wong E
Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3137-50. PubMed ID: 18697539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of linac based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and tomotherapy treatment plans for skull-base tumors.
Soisson ET; Tomé WA; Richards GM; Mehta MP
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 16490269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment and dosimetric advantages between VMAT, IMRT, and helical tomotherapy in prostate cancer.
Tsai CL; Wu JK; Chao HL; Tsai YC; Cheng JC
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 20634054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy.
Yu CX; Li XA; Ma L; Chen D; Naqvi S; Shepard D; Sarfaraz M; Holmes TW; Suntharalingam M; Mansfield CM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):453-63. PubMed ID: 12023150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of IMRT treatment plans between linac and helical tomotherapy based on integral dose and inhomogeneity index.
Shi C; Peñagarícano J; Papanikolaou N
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 18674686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Helical tomotherapy for parotid gland tumors.
Lee TK; Rosen II; Gibbons JP; Fields RS; Hogstrom KR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Mar; 70(3):883-91. PubMed ID: 18164857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
