251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18396927)
1. Illusory spectrotemporal ripples created with binaurally correlated noise.
Nassiri R; Escabí MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):EL92-8. PubMed ID: 18396927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of the binaural temporal window using a lateralisation task.
Kolarik AJ; Culling JF
Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 248(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 19111600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cortical Processing of Binaural Cues as Shown by EEG Responses to Random-Chord Stereograms.
Pöntynen H; Salminen N
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Feb; 23(1):75-94. PubMed ID: 34904205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revision and validation of a binaural model for speech intelligibility in noise.
Jelfs S; Culling JF; Lavandier M
Hear Res; 2011 May; 275(1-2):96-104. PubMed ID: 21156201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pitch detection of dynamic iterated rippled noise by humans and a modified auditory model.
Denham S
Biosystems; 2005; 79(1-3):199-206. PubMed ID: 15649605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comment on "Acoustic chaos in a duct with two separate sound sources" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 120-126 (2001)].
Castrejón-Pita AA; Castrejón-Pita JR; Huelsz G; Sarmiento-Galán A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):2702-5. PubMed ID: 19045755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of binaural speech intelligibility with frequency-dependent interaural phase differences.
Beutelmann R; Brand T; Kollmeier B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1359-68. PubMed ID: 19739750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating signal-to-noise ratios, loudness, and related measures as indicators of airborne sound insulation.
Park HK; Bradley JS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1219-30. PubMed ID: 19739735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sound segregation based on temporal envelope structure and binaural cues.
Schimmel O; van de Par S; Breebaart J; Kohlrausch A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1130-45. PubMed ID: 18681602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influences of auditory object formation on phonemic restoration.
Shinn-Cunningham BG; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):295-301. PubMed ID: 18177159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binaural dereverberation based on interaural coherence histograms.
Westermann A; Buchholz JM; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2767-77. PubMed ID: 23654384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech perception from monaural and binaural information.
Culling JF; Edmonds BA; Hodder KI
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jan; 119(1):559-65. PubMed ID: 16454309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the influence of interaural differences on temporal perception of noise bursts of different durations.
Schimmel O; Kohlrausch A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):986-97. PubMed ID: 18247901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spectral cues explain illusory elevation effects with stereo sounds in cats.
Tollin DJ; Yin TC
J Neurophysiol; 2003 Jul; 90(1):525-30. PubMed ID: 12843315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The normalized interaural correlation: accounting for NoS pi thresholds obtained with Gaussian and "low-noise" masking noise.
Bernstein LR; van de Par S; Trahiotis C
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):870-6. PubMed ID: 10462792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Binaural perception of the modulation depth of AM signals.
Ozimek E; Konieczny J; Sone T
Hear Res; 2008 Jan; 235(1-2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18082983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence. III. Narrowband experiments and binaural models.
Goupell MJ; Hartmann WM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1029-45. PubMed ID: 17672651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners.
Saoji AA; Litvak L; Spahr AJ; Eddins DA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):955-8. PubMed ID: 19739707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of spectro-temporal modulation changes produced by multi-channel compression on intelligibility in a competing-speech task.
Stone MA; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1063-76. PubMed ID: 18247908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Focus, prosodic context, and phonological feature specification: patterns of variation in fricative production.
Silbert N; de Jong K
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2769-79. PubMed ID: 18529193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
