These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18397016)

  • 1. Relationship between listening difficulty and acoustical objective measures in reverberant sound fields.
    Sato H; Morimoto M; Sato H; Wada M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2087-93. PubMed ID: 18397016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between listening difficulty rating and objective measures in reverberant and noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons.
    Sato H; Morimoto M; Wada M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4596-605. PubMed ID: 22712933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of aging on word intelligibility and listening difficulty in various reverberant fields.
    Sato H; Sato H; Morimoto M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):2915-22. PubMed ID: 17550189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Listening difficulty as a subjective measure for evaluation of speech transmission performance in public spaces.
    Morimoto M; Sato H; Kobayashi M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1607-13. PubMed ID: 15478426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using listening difficulty ratings of conditions for speech communication in rooms.
    Sato H; Bradley JS; Morimoto M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1157-67. PubMed ID: 15807005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech produced in noise: Relationship between listening difficulty and acoustic and durational parameters.
    Graetzer S; Bottalico P; Hunter EJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):974. PubMed ID: 28863615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time course of a perceptual enhancement effect for noise-masked speech in reverberant environments.
    Brandewie E; Zahorik P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL265-70. PubMed ID: 23927235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimum speech level to minimize listening difficulty in public spaces.
    Kobayashi M; Morimoto M; Sato H; Sato H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):251-6. PubMed ID: 17297780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceived listening effort and speech intelligibility in reverberation and noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Schepker H; Haeder K; Rennies J; Holube I
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Dec; 55(12):738-747. PubMed ID: 27627181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of type of early reflection, clarity of speech, reverberation and diffuse noise on the spatial perception of a speech source and its intelligibility.
    Prodi N; Pellegatti M; Visentin C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 May; 151(5):3522. PubMed ID: 35649908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
    Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of speech transmission in open public spaces affected by combined noises.
    Lee PJ; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 21786892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Classroom Acoustics for Enhancing Students' Understanding When a Teacher Suffers From a Dysphonic Voice.
    Bottalico P; Murgia S; Mekus T; Flaherty M
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2023 Oct; 54(4):1195-1207. PubMed ID: 37343547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of a test battery for evaluating speech perception in complex listening environments.
    Brungart DS; Sheffield BM; Kubli LR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):777-90. PubMed ID: 25096112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A dissociation between speech understanding and perceived reverberation.
    Ellis GM; Zahorik P
    Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 379():52-58. PubMed ID: 31075611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement of acoustical characteristics of mosques in Saudi Arabia.
    Abdou AA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1505-17. PubMed ID: 12656385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech intelligibility in rooms: Effect of prior listening exposure interacts with room acoustics.
    Zahorik P; Brandewie EJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):74. PubMed ID: 27475133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.