These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18397590)
1. Research quality and integrity. Smith AJ Prim Dent Care; 2008 Apr; 15(2):44; author reply 44. PubMed ID: 18397590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ensuring the quality of scientific research for evidence-based practice. Batchelor P Prim Dent Care; 2008 Jan; 15(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 18198046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Without scientific integrity, there can be no evidence base. Jette AM Phys Ther; 2005 Nov; 85(11):1122-3. PubMed ID: 16253041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [From the Cochrane Library: the use of peer review is still under discussion]. Stijntjes F; Veeken H Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(16):934-7. PubMed ID: 18561790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative]. Werkö L Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Scientific misconduct, mistakes or something in between?]. Levi R Lakartidningen; 2006 Apr 12-25; 103(15-16):1203-5. PubMed ID: 16696201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research collaborations: trial, trust, and truth. Hanawalt PC Cell; 2006 Sep; 126(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 16959557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Doctor admits Lancet study is fiction. Marris E Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):248-9. PubMed ID: 16421528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Journals should set a new standard in transparency. Dellavalle RP; Lundahl K; Freeman SR; Schilling LM Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7126):364. PubMed ID: 17251958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence-based medicine and the peer review process: complementary or at odds? Fisher CG; Vaccaro AR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan; 37(1):E1-2. PubMed ID: 22179321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Are Impact Factors corrupting truth and utility in biomedical research? Suhrbier A; Poland GA Vaccine; 2013 Dec; 31(51):6041-2. PubMed ID: 24184289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [To find out or to think of--the little difference]. Haug C Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(3):293. PubMed ID: 16440029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence-based burn care--An assessment of the methodological quality of research published in burn care journals from 1982 to 2008. Al-Benna S; Alzoubaidi D; Al-Ajam Y Burns; 2010 Dec; 36(8):1190-5. PubMed ID: 20621705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ESH statement on detection and punishment of abstract fraud and poster plagiarism. Kjeldsen SE; Narkiewicz K; Cifková R; Mancia G Blood Press; 2005; 14(6):322-3. PubMed ID: 16403685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Standardization of reviews of scientific publications]. Ventura AG Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2009; 72(4):574-5; author reply 575. PubMed ID: 19839127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Touchstone Process: an ongoing critical evaluation of reiki in the scientific literature. Baldwin AL; Vitale A; Brownell E; Scicinski J; Kearns M; Rand W Holist Nurs Pract; 2010; 24(5):260-76. PubMed ID: 20706088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]