These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1839833)

  • 1. A clinical comparison of a glass ionomer cement and a microfilled composite resin in restoring root caries: two-year results.
    Kaurich M; Kawakami K; Perez P; Munn T; Hasse AL; Garrett NR
    Gen Dent; 1991; 39(5):346-9. PubMed ID: 1839833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of a glass ionomer cement and a microfilled composite resin in the treatment of root surface caries.
    Levy SM; Jenson ME; Doering JV; Sheth JJ
    Gen Dent; 1989; 37(6):468-72. PubMed ID: 2534806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The clinical evaluation of glass ionomer cements and microfilled composite resins in the treatment of cervical lesions of the teeth (confirmed with scanning electron microscopy).
    Shahani DR; Kolwalkar NS
    J Indian Dent Assoc; 1986 Jan; 58(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 3457864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 3-year clinical evaluation of glass ionomer cements as Class III restorations.
    Osborne JW; Berry TG
    Am J Dent; 1990 Apr; 3(2):40-3. PubMed ID: 2150170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
    McComb D; Erickson RL; Maxymiw WG; Wood RE
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentin bonding, caries control.
    Swift EJ
    J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(5):236-7. PubMed ID: 11338489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations.
    Brackett WW; Dib A; Brackett MG; Reyes AA; Estrada BE
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of a dentinal adhesive system: three-year results.
    Duke ES; Robbins JW; Snyder DS
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Nov; 22(11):889-95. PubMed ID: 1839860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fluid flow after resin-composite restoration in extracted carious teeth.
    Banomyong D; Palamara JE; Messer HH; Burrow MF
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 19583764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fluoride release and caries inhibition associated with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement at varying fluoride loading doses.
    Donly KJ; Segura A
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 12074234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiopacity of glass-ionomer/composite resin hybrid materials.
    Hara AT; Serra MC; Rodrigues Júnior AL
    Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 11445919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of various surface coatings on fluoride release from glass-ionomer cement.
    Castro GW; Gray SE; Buikema DJ; Reagan SE
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(5):194-8. PubMed ID: 8700760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coronal microleakage in conservatively restored endodontic access preparations.
    Kleitches AJ; Lemon RR; Jeansonne BG
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1995 Jan; 75(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 9520778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Restoration of root caries with dentinal bonding agent and microfilled composite resin: 1-year clinical evaluation.
    Sheth JJ; Jesen ME; Wefel JS; Levy SM
    Gerodontics; 1988 Apr; 4(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 3061862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report.
    Mjör IA
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 9063229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.
    Brackett WW; Gilpatrick RO; Browning WD; Gregory PN
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10337292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up.
    Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Palma-Dibb RG
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.