These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1839860)

  • 21. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. ER-YAG laser pretreatment effect on in vitro secondary caries formation around composite restorations.
    Ceballos L; Toledano M; Osorio R; García-Godoy F; Flaitz C; Hicks J
    Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 11806480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of a filled adhesive on bond strength in three dentinal bonding systems.
    Fanning DE; Wakefield CW; Robbins JW; Bagley AL
    Gen Dent; 1995; 43(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 8940582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive interface in primary teeth.
    Rontani RM; Ducatti CH; Garcia-Godoy F; De Goes MF
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 11314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical performance and SEM evaluation of direct composite restorations in primary molars.
    Puppin-Rontani RM; de Góes MF; Voelske CE; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 17073199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Adhesive interface between resin and etched dentin of cervical erosion/abrasion lesions.
    Harnirattisai C; Inokoshi S; Shimada Y; Hosoda H
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(4):138-43. PubMed ID: 8152981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Three-year clinical evaluation of the Clearfil Liner Bond system.
    Mandras RS; Thurmond JW; Latta MA; Matranga LF; Kildee JM; Barkmeier WW
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(6):266-70. PubMed ID: 9610324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. 3-year clinical evaluation of modified Gluma adhesive systems in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions.
    Hörsted-Bindslev P; Knudsen J; Baelum V
    Am J Dent; 1996 Feb; 9(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 9002810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):915-22. PubMed ID: 18155288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bonding to worn or fractured incisal edges: shear bond strength of new adhesive systems.
    Goracci C; Bertelli E; Ferrari M
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Jan; 35(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 14765637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fluid flow after resin-composite restoration in extracted carious teeth.
    Banomyong D; Palamara JE; Messer HH; Burrow MF
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 19583764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Five-year study of cervical erosions restored with resin and dentin-bonding agent.
    Hansen EK
    Scand J Dent Res; 1992 Aug; 100(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 1439532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel.
    Van Meerbeek B; Kanumilli P; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Peumans M
    Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 15766585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A randomized controlled clinical trial of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 1 year.
    Van Landuyt KL; Peumans M; Fieuws S; De Munck J; Cardoso MV; Ermis RB; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):847-55. PubMed ID: 18656295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Luo Y; Lo EC; Fang DT; Wei SH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive at 18 months.
    Perdigão J; Carmo AR; Anauate-Netto C; Amore R; Lewgoy HR; Cordeiro HJ; Dutra-Corrêa M; Castilhos N
    Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 15973834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vitro evaluation of four adhesive materials in the treatment of cervical lesions.
    Negri P
    Minerva Stomatol; 1999 Jun; 48(6 Suppl 1):65-71. PubMed ID: 10549220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of a glass ionomer cement and a microfilled composite resin in the treatment of root surface caries.
    Levy SM; Jenson ME; Doering JV; Sheth JJ
    Gen Dent; 1989; 37(6):468-72. PubMed ID: 2534806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
    Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical evaluation of self-etch adhesives in Class V non-carious lesions.
    Abdalla AI; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):289-92. PubMed ID: 17073206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.