These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1839860)

  • 41. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up.
    Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Palma-Dibb RG
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Clinical evaluation of two adhesive composite cements for the suppression of dentinal cold sensitivity.
    Sensat ML; Brackett WW; Meinberg TA; Beatty MW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 12239480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. In vitro and clinical evaluations of a dentin bonding system with a dentin primer.
    Senda A; Kamiya K; Gomi A; Kawaguchi T
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(2):51-7. PubMed ID: 8700771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation.
    van Dijken JW; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; Lindberg A
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1101-7. PubMed ID: 17113139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Three-year clinical evaluation of a compomer and a resin composite as Class V filling materials.
    Gallo JR; Burgess JO; Ripps AH; Walker RS; Ireland EJ; Mercante DE; Davidson JM
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 15986945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Direct tooth-colored materials for noncarious lesions: a 3-year clinical report.
    Neo J; Chew CL
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 9063232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. 1-year clinical evaluation of one-step in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
    Am J Dent; 1999 Dec; 12(6):283-5. PubMed ID: 10850247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Shear bond strength of composite to enamel and dentin using Scotchbond Multi-Purpose.
    Barkmeier WW; Erickson RL
    Am J Dent; 1994 Jun; 7(3):175-9. PubMed ID: 7993609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Restoration of root caries with dentinal bonding agent and microfilled composite resin: 1-year clinical evaluation.
    Sheth JJ; Jesen ME; Wefel JS; Levy SM
    Gerodontics; 1988 Apr; 4(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 3061862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Influence of gaps in adhesive restorations in the development of secondary caries lesions: an in situ evaluation.
    Barata JS; Casagrande L; Pitoni CM; De Araujo FB; Garcia-Godoy F; Groismann S
    Am J Dent; 2012 Aug; 25(4):244-8. PubMed ID: 23082391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A clinical comparison of a glass ionomer cement and a microfilled composite resin in restoring root caries: two-year results.
    Kaurich M; Kawakami K; Perez P; Munn T; Hasse AL; Garrett NR
    Gen Dent; 1991; 39(5):346-9. PubMed ID: 1839833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Clinical and controlled evaluation after 2 years of an enamel-dentin adhesive and a microfilled composite in the treatment of cervical lesions].
    Nonato M; Calura G
    Dent Cadmos; 1984 Mar; 52(3 Suppl):71-5. PubMed ID: 6240418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluation of two dentin adhesives in cervical lesions.
    Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Oct; 70(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 8229880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A 3-year evaluation of Gluma and Gluma/Scotchbond for restoration of cervical erosions.
    van Dijken JW
    Scand J Dent Res; 1990 Aug; 98(4):341-4. PubMed ID: 2119052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Three-year study of cervical erosions restored with resin and dentin-bonding agent.
    Hansen EK
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1989 Oct; 47(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 2531531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of gap geometry on secondary caries wall lesion development.
    Nassar HM; González-Cabezas C
    Caries Res; 2011; 45(4):346-52. PubMed ID: 21778722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Clinical evaluation of four dentin bonding agents in Class V abrasion lesions: a four-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    Dent Mater; 1994 Sep; 10(5):319-24. PubMed ID: 7498593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Clinical evaluation of Scotchbond: three-year results.
    Tyas MJ; Burns GA; Byrne PF; Cunningham PJ; Dobson BC; Widdop FT
    Aust Dent J; 1989 Jun; 34(3):277-9. PubMed ID: 2527492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Twelve-month clinical study of dentinal adhesives in class V cervical lesions.
    Heymann HO; Sturdevant JR; Brunson WD; Wilder AD; Sluder TB; Bayne SC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1988 Feb; 116(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 2963849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.