These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18399426)

  • 21. Comparison of collectors of airborne spray drift. Experiments in a wind tunnel and field measurements.
    Arvidsson T; Bergström L; Kreuger J
    Pest Manag Sci; 2011 Jun; 67(6):725-33. PubMed ID: 21445941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. DRIFT POTENTIAL OF TILTED SHIELDED ROTARY ATOMISERS BASED ON WIND TUNNEL MEASUREMENTS.
    Salah SO; Massinon M; De Cock N; Schiffers B; Lebeau F
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2015; 80(3):303-12. PubMed ID: 27141728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Agrochemical spray drift; assessment and mitigation--a review.
    Felsot AS; Unsworth JB; Linders JB; Roberts G; Rautman D; Harris C; Carazo E
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2011; 46(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 20981606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spray drift reduction under Southern European conditions: a pilot study in the Ecopest Project in Greece.
    Kasiotis KM; Glass CR; Tsakirakis AN; Machera K
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 479-480():132-7. PubMed ID: 24561292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development and assessment of a novel servo-controlled spraying system for real time adjustment of the orientation angle of the nozzles of a boom sprayer.
    Bayat A; İtmeç M; Özlüoymak ÖB
    Pest Manag Sci; 2023 Nov; 79(11):4439-4450. PubMed ID: 37405577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of natural windbreaks on drift reduction in orchard spraying.
    Wenneker M; Heijne B; van de Zande JC
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):961-9. PubMed ID: 16628943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Drift studies--comparison of field and wind tunnel experiments.
    Stadler R; Regenauer W
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):971-3. PubMed ID: 16628944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative study of anti-drift nozzles' wear.
    Bolly G; Huyghebaert B; Mostade O; Oger R
    Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2002; 67(2):29-35. PubMed ID: 12701403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spray Drift from Three Airblast Sprayer Technologies in a Modern Orchard Work Environment.
    Kasner EJ; Fenske RA; Hoheisel GA; Galvin K; Blanco MN; Seto EYW; Yost MG
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2020 Jan; 64(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 31786605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Windbreaks as a pesticide drift mitigation strategy: a review.
    Ucar T; Hall FR
    Pest Manag Sci; 2001 Aug; 57(8):663-75. PubMed ID: 11517719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spray drift as influenced by meteorological and technical factors.
    Arvidsson T; Bergström L; Kreuger J
    Pest Manag Sci; 2011 May; 67(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 21472973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of tank mixed adjuvants on the drift potential of phenmedipham formulations.
    Stainier C; Destain MF; Schiffers B; Lebeau F
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):979-87. PubMed ID: 16628946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Real-Time Monitoring of Spray Drift from Three Different Orchard Sprayers.
    Blanco MN; Fenske RA; Kasner EJ; Yost MG; Seto E; Austin E
    Chemosphere; 2019 May; 222():46-55. PubMed ID: 30690400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The assessment of spray drift damage for ten major crops in Belgium.
    de Schampheleire M; Spanoghe P; Steurbaut W; Nuyttens D; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):1037-42. PubMed ID: 16628952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Risk assessment of environmental and bystander exposure from agricultural unmanned aerial vehicle sprayers in golden coconut plantations: Effects of droplet size and spray volume.
    Lan X; Wang J; Chen P; Liang Q; Zhang L; Ma C
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2024 Sep; 282():116675. PubMed ID: 38971099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development of an imaging system for single droplet characterization using a droplet generator.
    Minov SV; Cointault F; Vangeyte J; Pieters JG; Hijazi B; Nuyttens D
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2012; 77(4):469-81. PubMed ID: 23885414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaporation and wetted area of single droplets on waxy and hairy leaf surfaces.
    Zhu H; Yu Y; Ozkan HE; Derksen RC; Krause CR
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):711-8. PubMed ID: 19226818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The efficiency of drift-reducing measures to protect the Flemish environment.
    De Schampheleire M; Spanoghe P; Nuyttens D; Baetens K; Cornelis W; Gabriels D
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 17191485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Field experiment on spray drift: deposition and airborne drift during application to a winter wheat crop.
    Wolters A; Linnemann V; van de Zande JC; Vereecken H
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Nov; 405(1-3):269-77. PubMed ID: 18723207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development of the spray drift task force database for aerial applications.
    Hewitt AJ; Johnson DR; Fish JD; Hermansky CG; Valcore DL
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 Mar; 21(3):648-58. PubMed ID: 11878479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.