These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18399885)

  • 1. First impressions and last resorts: how listeners adjust to speaker variability.
    Kraljic T; Samuel AG; Brennan SE
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Apr; 19(4):332-8. PubMed ID: 18399885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of speaker variability and phoneme location on speech perception.
    Mullennix JW; Farnsworth LM; Harshaw T; Bittle J; Evanitz M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Aug; 91(1):299-310. PubMed ID: 11011901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relative contributions of speaking fundamental frequency and formant frequencies to gender identification based on isolated vowels.
    Gelfer MP; Mikos VA
    J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):544-54. PubMed ID: 16301101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of coarticulatory information in normal speech and dysarthria.
    Tjaden K; Sussman J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):888-902. PubMed ID: 16908883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speaker normalization using cortical strip maps: a neural model for steady-state vowel categorization.
    Ames H; Grossberg S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3918-36. PubMed ID: 19206817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony.
    Regel S; Coulson S; Gunter TC
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1311():121-35. PubMed ID: 19900421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speaker identity supports phonetic category learning.
    Mani N; Schneider S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):623-9. PubMed ID: 23148468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional influences on functional mapping of speech sounds in human auditory cortex.
    Obleser J; Elbert T; Eulitz C
    BMC Neurosci; 2004 Jul; 5():24. PubMed ID: 15268765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):391-409. PubMed ID: 17469975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Voice aftereffects of adaptation to speaker identity.
    Zäske R; Schweinberger SR; Kawahara H
    Hear Res; 2010 Sep; 268(1-2):38-45. PubMed ID: 20430084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Children's perception of visual and auditory speech.
    Massaro DW
    Child Dev; 1984 Oct; 55(5):1777-88. PubMed ID: 6510054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal?
    Kraljic T; Samuel AG
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Sep; 51(2):141-78. PubMed ID: 16095588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Listeners' reactions to mild misarticulation of /l/.
    Burroughs EI; Small LH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Aug; 73(1):184-6. PubMed ID: 1945685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of dentalization and devoicing of the /z/ phoneme on listeners' judgment of a speaker's sexual orientation.
    Huff E; Phillips SD; Dancer J; Davis P
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Oct; 97(2):631-4. PubMed ID: 14620253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of speaker gender identification in relative fundamental frequency height estimation from multispeaker, brief speech segments.
    Lee CY; Dutton L; Ram G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):384-8. PubMed ID: 20649232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inferring causes during speech perception.
    Liu L; Jaeger TF
    Cognition; 2018 May; 174():55-70. PubMed ID: 29425987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Listeners' perceptions of the personality of male alaryngeal speakers.
    Evitts PM; Gabel R; Searl J
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2007; 32(2):53-9. PubMed ID: 17613786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception of time-compressed consonant-nucleus-consonant monosyllables by non-native speaker/listeners of English.
    Nikam S; Beasley DS; Rintelmann WF
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 2(2):45-8. PubMed ID: 977429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the perception of similarity among talkers.
    Remez RE; Fellowes JM; Nagel DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3688-96. PubMed ID: 18247776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intonation and communicative intent in mothers' speech to infants: is the melody the message?
    Fernald A
    Child Dev; 1989 Dec; 60(6):1497-510. PubMed ID: 2612255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.