These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18401273)

  • 1. Evolving attractive faces using morphing technology and a genetic algorithm: a new approach to determining ideal facial aesthetics.
    Wong BJ; Karimi K; Devcic Z; McLaren CE; Chen WP
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Jun; 118(6):962-74. PubMed ID: 18401273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Quantitative Approach to Determining the Ideal Female Lip Aesthetic and Its Effect on Facial Attractiveness.
    Popenko NA; Tripathi PB; Devcic Z; Karimi K; Osann K; Wong BJF
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Jul; 19(4):261-267. PubMed ID: 28208179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new approach in determining lateral facial attractiveness.
    Karimi K; Devcic Z; Avila D; Popenko N; Wong B
    Laryngoscope; 2010; 120 Suppl 4():S157. PubMed ID: 21225755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Morphological quantitative criteria and aesthetic evaluation of eight female Han face types.
    Zhao Q; Zhou R; Zhang X; Sun H; Lu X; Xia D; Song M; Liang Y
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Apr; 37(2):445-53. PubMed ID: 23404449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frontal facial analysis of female celebrity attractiveness standards through artificial intelligence.
    Grillo R; Quinta Reis BA; Lima BC; Peral Ferreira Pinto LA; Melhem-Elias F
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 52(6):722-726. PubMed ID: 38580557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective assessment of the contribution of dental esthetics and facial attractiveness in men via eye tracking.
    Baker RS; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel SF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):523-533. PubMed ID: 29602344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Morphometric facial analysis: a methodology to create lateral facial images.
    Karimi K; Devcic Z; Popenko N; Oyoyo U; Wong BJ
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 19(4):403-10. PubMed ID: 26084451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of Objective 3-Dimensional Measures of Facial Shape and Symmetry on Perceptions of Facial Attractiveness.
    Hatch CD; Wehby GL; Nidey NL; Moreno Uribe LM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 75(9):1958-1970. PubMed ID: 28577372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A web-based method for rating facial attractiveness.
    Devcic Z; Karimi K; Popenko N; Wong BJ
    Laryngoscope; 2010 May; 120(5):902-6. PubMed ID: 20422683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ideal proportions in full face front view, contemporary versus antique.
    Mommaerts MY; Moerenhout BA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 39(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 20542444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attractiveness Evaluation and Identity of Self-face: The Effect of Sexual Dimorphism.
    Li Z; Lei X; Yan X; Hu Z; Liu H
    Iperception; 2021 Nov; 12(6):20416695211058799. PubMed ID: 34881018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The "Central Tendency Bias" in the assessment of facial attractiveness in group-based and individual ratings-A survey-based study in 727 volunteers.
    Alfertshofer M; Kempa J; Biesman BS; Knoedler S; Knoedler L; Bravo C; Davidovic K; Antoszewski B; Timler W; Kasielska-Trojan A; Cotofana S
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 May; 92():264-275. PubMed ID: 38582052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The virtual focus group: a modern methodology for facial attractiveness rating.
    Popenko NA; Devcic Z; Karimi K; Wong BJF
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Sep; 130(3):455e-461e. PubMed ID: 22929271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Panel perception of facial appearance of cleft patients generated by use of a morphing technique.
    Yildirim V; Hemprich A; Gründl M; Pausch NC
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 18(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 24442369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the influence of dental and facial aesthetics in determining overall attractiveness.
    Prasad KN; Sabrish S; Mathew S; Shivamurthy PG; Pattabiraman V; Sagarkar R
    Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):684-697. PubMed ID: 30385289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identifying ideal brow vector position: empirical analysis of three brow archetypes.
    Hamamoto AA; Liu TW; Wong BJ
    Facial Plast Surg; 2013 Feb; 29(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 23426756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Different processes in attractiveness assessments for unattractive and highly attractive faces-The role of presentation duration and rotation.
    Stróżak P; Zielińska M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Sep; 200():102946. PubMed ID: 31693937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When beauty breaks down: investigation of the effect of spatial quantisation on aesthetic evaluation of facial images.
    Bachmann T
    Perception; 2007; 36(6):840-9. PubMed ID: 17718363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Software-based evaluation of human attractiveness: a pilot study.
    Patzelt SB; Schaible LK; Stampf S; Kohal RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1176-81. PubMed ID: 25218031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Facial attractiveness: is the whole more than the sum of its parts?
    Sharabi SE; Hatef DA; Hollier LH
    Aesthet Surg J; 2010 Mar; 30(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 20442090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.