These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18401756)

  • 1. The use of seaweed and sugarcane bagasse for the biological treatment of metal-contaminated waters under sulfate-reducing conditions.
    Gonçalves MM; de Oliveira Mello LA; da Costa AC
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 147(1-3):97-105. PubMed ID: 18401756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Heavy metal removal from synthetic wastewaters in an anaerobic bioreactor using stillage from ethanol distilleries as a carbon source.
    Gonçalves MM; da Costa AC; Leite SG; Sant'Anna GL
    Chemosphere; 2007 Nov; 69(11):1815-20. PubMed ID: 17644156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Removal of sulfate and heavy metals by sulfate reducing bacteria in short-term bench scale upflow anaerobic packed bed reactor runs.
    Jong T; Parry DL
    Water Res; 2003 Aug; 37(14):3379-89. PubMed ID: 12834731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of inoculum on the performance of sulfate-reducing columns treating heavy metal contaminated water.
    Pruden A; Messner N; Pereyra L; Hanson RE; Hiibel SR; Reardon KF
    Water Res; 2007 Feb; 41(4):904-14. PubMed ID: 17222885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of sulfate reduction activity on biological treatment of hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] contaminated electroplating wastewater under sulfate-rich condition.
    Chang IS; Kim BH
    Chemosphere; 2007 Jun; 68(2):218-26. PubMed ID: 17337035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Silage supports sulfate reduction in the treatment of metals- and sulfate-containing waste waters.
    Wakeman KD; Erving L; Riekkola-Vanhanen ML; Puhakka JA
    Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(17):4932-9. PubMed ID: 20708212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Column experiments to assess the effects of electron donors on the efficiency of in situ precipitation of Zn, Cd, Co and Ni in contaminated groundwater applying the biological sulfate removal technology.
    Geets J; Vanbroekhoven K; Borremans B; Vangronsveld J; Diels L; van der Lelie D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2006 Oct; 13(6):362-78. PubMed ID: 17120826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microbial community activities during establishment, performance, and decline of bench-scale passive treatment systems for mine drainage.
    Logan MV; Reardon KF; Figueroa LA; McLain JE; Ahmann DM
    Water Res; 2005 Nov; 39(18):4537-51. PubMed ID: 16213004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microbial sulfate reduction under sequentially acidic conditions in an upflow anaerobic packed bed bioreactor.
    Jong T; Parry DL
    Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(13):2561-71. PubMed ID: 16814360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural network prediction of thermophilic (65 degrees C) sulfidogenic fluidized-bed reactor performance for the treatment of metal-containing wastewater.
    Sahinkaya E; Ozkaya B; Kaksonen AH; Puhakka JA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Jul; 97(4):780-7. PubMed ID: 17154306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inhibition of sulfate reduction by iron, cadmium and sulfide in granular sludge.
    Gonzalez-Silva BM; Briones-Gallardo R; Razo-Flores E; Celis LB
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Dec; 172(1):400-7. PubMed ID: 19695775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lead removal through biological sulfate reduction process.
    Hien Hoa TT; Liamleam W; Annachhatre AP
    Bioresour Technol; 2007 Sep; 98(13):2538-48. PubMed ID: 17174088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Heavy metal removal in anaerobic semi-continuous stirred tank reactors by a consortium of sulfate-reducing bacteria.
    Kieu HT; Müller E; Horn H
    Water Res; 2011 Jul; 45(13):3863-70. PubMed ID: 21632086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biological treatment of highly contaminated acid mine drainage in batch reactors: Long-term treatment and reactive mixture characterization.
    Neculita CM; Zagury GJ
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Sep; 157(2-3):358-66. PubMed ID: 18281152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of sulfidogenic anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) treating acidic and zinc-containing wastewater.
    Bayrakdar A; Sahinkaya E; Gungor M; Uyanik S; Atasoy AD
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Oct; 100(19):4354-60. PubMed ID: 19428238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wine wastes as carbon source for biological treatment of acid mine drainage.
    Costa MC; Santos ES; Barros RJ; Pires C; Martins M
    Chemosphere; 2009 May; 75(6):831-6. PubMed ID: 19201010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biochar from anaerobically digested sugarcane bagasse.
    Inyang M; Gao B; Pullammanappallil P; Ding W; Zimmerman AR
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Nov; 101(22):8868-72. PubMed ID: 20634061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Specific growth rate of sulfate reducing bacteria in the presence of manganese and cadmium.
    Medírcio SN; Leão VA; Teixeira MC
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 May; 143(1-2):593-6. PubMed ID: 17095153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determination of the elemental composition of molasses and its suitability as carbon source for growth of sulphate-reducing bacteria.
    Teclu D; Tivchev G; Laing M; Wallis M
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jan; 161(2-3):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18541372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Model experiments on the microbial removal of chromium from contaminated groundwater.
    Vainshtein M; Kuschk P; Mattusch J; Vatsourina A; Wiessner A
    Water Res; 2003 Mar; 37(6):1401-5. PubMed ID: 12598203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.