BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

733 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18402900)

  • 1. A randomized comparison of triple-site versus dual-site ventricular stimulation in patients with congestive heart failure.
    Leclercq C; Gadler F; Kranig W; Ellery S; Gras D; Lazarus A; Clémenty J; Boulogne E; Daubert JC;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Apr; 51(15):1455-62. PubMed ID: 18402900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biventricular versus conventional right ventricular stimulation for patients with standard pacing indication and left ventricular dysfunction: the Homburg Biventricular Pacing Evaluation (HOBIPACE).
    Kindermann M; Hennen B; Jung J; Geisel J; Böhm M; Fröhlig G
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 May; 47(10):1927-37. PubMed ID: 16697307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Right ventricular lead positioning does not influence the benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation.
    Rönn F; Kesek M; Karp K; Henein M; Jensen SM
    Europace; 2011 Dec; 13(12):1747-52. PubMed ID: 21712261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-term effects of right-left heart sequential cardiac resynchronization in patients with heart failure, chronic atrial fibrillation, and atrioventricular nodal block.
    Hay I; Melenovsky V; Fetics BJ; Judge DP; Kramer A; Spinelli J; Reister C; Kass DA; Berger RD
    Circulation; 2004 Nov; 110(22):3404-10. PubMed ID: 15557370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Upgrading from single chamber right ventricular to biventricular pacing in permanently paced patients with worsening heart failure: The RD-CHF Study.
    Leclercq C; Cazeau S; Lellouche D; Fossati F; Anselme F; Davy JM; Sadoul N; Klug D; Mollo L; Daubert JC
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan; 30 Suppl 1():S23-30. PubMed ID: 17302711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of long-term resynchronization therapy on left ventricular remodeling in pacemaker patients upgraded to biventricular devices.
    Vatankulu MA; Goktekin O; Kaya MG; Ayhan S; Kucukdurmaz Z; Sutton R; Henein M
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 May; 103(9):1280-4. PubMed ID: 19406272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of right ventricular lead location on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure.
    Haghjoo M; Bonakdar HR; Jorat MV; Fazelifar AF; Alizadeh A; Ojaghi-Haghjghi Z; Esmaielzadeh M; Sadr-Ameli MA
    Europace; 2009 Mar; 11(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 19136489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biventricular pacing improves the blunted force-frequency relation present during univentricular pacing in patients with heart failure and conduction delay.
    Vollmann D; Lüthje L; Schott P; Hasenfuss G; Unterberg-Buchwald C
    Circulation; 2006 Feb; 113(7):953-9. PubMed ID: 16476849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Left ventricular-based cardiac stimulation post AV nodal ablation evaluation (the PAVE study).
    Doshi RN; Daoud EG; Fellows C; Turk K; Duran A; Hamdan MH; Pires LA;
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2005 Nov; 16(11):1160-5. PubMed ID: 16302897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative assessment of right, left, and biventricular pacing in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation.
    Brignole M; Gammage M; Puggioni E; Alboni P; Raviele A; Sutton R; Vardas P; Bongiorni MG; Bergfeldt L; Menozzi C; Musso G;
    Eur Heart J; 2005 Apr; 26(7):712-22. PubMed ID: 15618036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical epicardial left ventricular lead versus coronary sinus lead placement in biventricular pacing.
    Mair H; Sachweh J; Meuris B; Nollert G; Schmoeckel M; Schuetz A; Reichart B; Daebritz S
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Feb; 27(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 15691676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of upgrading to biventricular pacing in patients with right ventricular pacing and congestive heart failure after atrioventricular junctional ablation for chronic atrial fibrillation.
    Valls-Bertault V; Fatemi M; Gilard M; Pennec PY; Etienne Y; Blanc JJ
    Europace; 2004 Sep; 6(5):438-43. PubMed ID: 15294269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial: rationale, design, results, clinical implications and lessons for future trials.
    Wilkoff BL;
    Card Electrophysiol Rev; 2003 Dec; 7(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 15071277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized comparison of simultaneous biventricular stimulation versus optimized interventricular delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy. The Resynchronization for the HemodYnamic Treatment for Heart Failure Management II implantable cardioverter defibrillator (RHYTHM II ICD) study.
    Boriani G; Müller CP; Seidl KH; Grove R; Vogt J; Danschel W; Schuchert A; Djiane P; Biffi M; Becker T; Bailleul C; Trappe HJ;
    Am Heart J; 2006 May; 151(5):1050-8. PubMed ID: 16644335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of 1-year effects of left ventricular and biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure who have ventricular arrhythmias and left bundle-branch block: the Bi vs Left Ventricular Pacing: an International Pilot Evaluation on Heart Failure Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias (BELIEVE) multicenter prospective randomized pilot study.
    Gasparini M; Bocchiardo M; Lunati M; Ravazzi PA; Santini M; Zardini M; Signorelli S; Passardi M; Klersy C;
    Am Heart J; 2006 Jul; 152(1):155.e1-7. PubMed ID: 16824846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pressure-volume loop analysis during implantation of biventricular pacemaker/cardiac resynchronization therapy device to optimize right and left ventricular pacing sites.
    Delnoy PP; Ottervanger JP; Luttikhuis HO; Vos DH; Elvan A; Ramdat Misier AR; Beukema WP; Steendijk P; van Hemel NM
    Eur Heart J; 2009 Apr; 30(7):797-804. PubMed ID: 19202156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of left ventricular epicardial and biventricular pacing on ventricular repolarization in normal-heart individuals and patients with congestive heart failure.
    Bai R; Yang XY; Song Y; Lin L; Lü JG; Ching CK; Pu J; Kam R; Hsu LF; Zhang CT; Teo WS; Wang L
    Europace; 2006 Nov; 8(11):1002-10. PubMed ID: 17043073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischemic versus non-ischemic heart failure: Differential effect of optimizing interventricular pacing interval.
    Marsan NA; Bleeker GB; Van Bommel RJ; Borleffs C; Bertini M; Holman ER; van der Wall EE; Schalij MJ; Bax JJ
    Am Heart J; 2009 Nov; 158(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19853696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive factors of difficult implantation procedure in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Bisch L; Da Costa A; Dauphinot V; Romeyer-Bouchard C; Khris L; M'baye A; Isaaz K
    Europace; 2010 Aug; 12(8):1141-8. PubMed ID: 20573673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of usefulness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure versus patients with sinus rhythm and heart failure.
    Delnoy PP; Ottervanger JP; Luttikhuis HO; Elvan A; Misier AR; Beukema WP; van Hemel NM
    Am J Cardiol; 2007 May; 99(9):1252-7. PubMed ID: 17478153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.