These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

747 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18403962)

  • 1. Dose assessment for reentry or reoccupancy and recovery of urban areas contaminated by a radiological dispersal device: the need for a consensus approach.
    Sullivan T; Musolino SV; DeFranco J
    Health Phys; 2008 May; 94(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 18403962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Valentin J;
    Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling of the EMRAS urban working group hypothetical scenario using the RESRAD-RDD methodology.
    Kamboj S; Cheng JJ; Yu C; Domotor S; Wallo A
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1012-8. PubMed ID: 19403213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Key sources of imprecision in radiological emergency response assessments.
    Haywood SM
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):169-83. PubMed ID: 18495989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ICRP publication 109. Application of the Commission's Recommendations for the protection of people in emergency exposure situations.
    Clarke R; Valentin J;
    Ann ICRP; 2009; 39(1):1-110. PubMed ID: 19853177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. External dosimetry in the aftermath of a radiological terrorist event.
    Klemic GA; Bailey PD; Miller KM; Monetti MA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):242-9. PubMed ID: 16606662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of health hazards resulting from a radiological terrorist attack in a city.
    Andersson KG; Mikkelsen T; Astrup P; Thykier-Nielsen S; Jacobsen LH; Schou-Jensen L; Hoe SC; Nielsen SP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):297-307. PubMed ID: 18550515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Details in relation to emergency planning in case of undesired dispersion of radioactivity].
    Hardeman F
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2005; 67(5-6):341-51. PubMed ID: 16408830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Organization of the nuclear emergency plan].
    Van Bladel L; Vandecasteele C
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2005; 67(5-6):337-40. PubMed ID: 16408829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is ICRP guidance on the use of reference levels consistent?
    Hedemann-Jensen P; McEwan AC
    J Radiol Prot; 2011 Dec; 31(4):431-44. PubMed ID: 22089983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How do we combine science and regulations for decision making following a terrorist incident involving radioactive materials?
    Poston JW; Ford JR
    Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):537-41. PubMed ID: 19820465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of fixatives for response to a radiation dispersal devise attack--a review of the current (2009) state-of-the-art.
    Parra RR; Medina VF; Conca JL
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Nov; 100(11):923-34. PubMed ID: 19700226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radioactive particles in dose assessments.
    Dale P; Robertson I; Toner M
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Oct; 99(10):1589-95. PubMed ID: 18657886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An integrated physical dispersion and behavioral response model for risk assessment of radiological dispersion device (RDD) events.
    Dombroski MJ; Fischbeck PS
    Risk Anal; 2006 Apr; 26(2):501-14. PubMed ID: 16573636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Usefulness and limits of biological dosimetry based on cytogenetic methods.
    Léonard A; Rueff J; Gerber GB; Léonard ED
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):448-54. PubMed ID: 16381765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk analysis using fuzzy set theory of the accidental exposure of medical staff during brachytherapy procedures.
    Castiglia F; Giardina M; Tomarchio E
    J Radiol Prot; 2010 Mar; 30(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 20220212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Worker and environmental protection issues in the remediation of an abandoned source manufacturing facility.
    Hoffman DE
    Health Phys; 2003 Feb; 84(2 Suppl):S30-6. PubMed ID: 12564344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improvement of modelling capabilities for assessing urban contamination: the EMRAS Urban Remediation Working Group.
    Thiessen KM; Batandjieva B; Andersson KG; Arkhipov A; Charnock TW; Gallay F; Gaschak S; Golikov V; Hwang WT; Kaiser JC; Kamboj S; Steiner M; Tomás J; Trifunovic D; Yu C; Zelmer RL; Zlobenko B
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1741-4. PubMed ID: 18513982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individuals' decisions affecting radiation exposure after a nuclear explosion.
    Florig HK; Fischhoff B
    Health Phys; 2007 May; 92(5):475-83. PubMed ID: 17429306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic reference levels for medical exposure of patients: ICRP guidance and related ICRU quantities.
    Rosenstein M
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):528-34. PubMed ID: 18849685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.