751 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18403962)
1. Dose assessment for reentry or reoccupancy and recovery of urban areas contaminated by a radiological dispersal device: the need for a consensus approach.
Sullivan T; Musolino SV; DeFranco J
Health Phys; 2008 May; 94(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 18403962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
Valentin J;
Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modeling of the EMRAS urban working group hypothetical scenario using the RESRAD-RDD methodology.
Kamboj S; Cheng JJ; Yu C; Domotor S; Wallo A
J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1012-8. PubMed ID: 19403213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Key sources of imprecision in radiological emergency response assessments.
Haywood SM
J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):169-83. PubMed ID: 18495989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ICRP publication 109. Application of the Commission's Recommendations for the protection of people in emergency exposure situations.
Clarke R; Valentin J;
Ann ICRP; 2009; 39(1):1-110. PubMed ID: 19853177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. External dosimetry in the aftermath of a radiological terrorist event.
Klemic GA; Bailey PD; Miller KM; Monetti MA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):242-9. PubMed ID: 16606662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimation of health hazards resulting from a radiological terrorist attack in a city.
Andersson KG; Mikkelsen T; Astrup P; Thykier-Nielsen S; Jacobsen LH; Schou-Jensen L; Hoe SC; Nielsen SP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):297-307. PubMed ID: 18550515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Details in relation to emergency planning in case of undesired dispersion of radioactivity].
Hardeman F
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2005; 67(5-6):341-51. PubMed ID: 16408830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Organization of the nuclear emergency plan].
Van Bladel L; Vandecasteele C
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2005; 67(5-6):337-40. PubMed ID: 16408829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is ICRP guidance on the use of reference levels consistent?
Hedemann-Jensen P; McEwan AC
J Radiol Prot; 2011 Dec; 31(4):431-44. PubMed ID: 22089983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How do we combine science and regulations for decision making following a terrorist incident involving radioactive materials?
Poston JW; Ford JR
Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):537-41. PubMed ID: 19820465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of fixatives for response to a radiation dispersal devise attack--a review of the current (2009) state-of-the-art.
Parra RR; Medina VF; Conca JL
J Environ Radioact; 2009 Nov; 100(11):923-34. PubMed ID: 19700226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radioactive particles in dose assessments.
Dale P; Robertson I; Toner M
J Environ Radioact; 2008 Oct; 99(10):1589-95. PubMed ID: 18657886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An integrated physical dispersion and behavioral response model for risk assessment of radiological dispersion device (RDD) events.
Dombroski MJ; Fischbeck PS
Risk Anal; 2006 Apr; 26(2):501-14. PubMed ID: 16573636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Usefulness and limits of biological dosimetry based on cytogenetic methods.
Léonard A; Rueff J; Gerber GB; Léonard ED
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):448-54. PubMed ID: 16381765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk analysis using fuzzy set theory of the accidental exposure of medical staff during brachytherapy procedures.
Castiglia F; Giardina M; Tomarchio E
J Radiol Prot; 2010 Mar; 30(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 20220212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Worker and environmental protection issues in the remediation of an abandoned source manufacturing facility.
Hoffman DE
Health Phys; 2003 Feb; 84(2 Suppl):S30-6. PubMed ID: 12564344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improvement of modelling capabilities for assessing urban contamination: the EMRAS Urban Remediation Working Group.
Thiessen KM; Batandjieva B; Andersson KG; Arkhipov A; Charnock TW; Gallay F; Gaschak S; Golikov V; Hwang WT; Kaiser JC; Kamboj S; Steiner M; Tomás J; Trifunovic D; Yu C; Zelmer RL; Zlobenko B
Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1741-4. PubMed ID: 18513982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Individuals' decisions affecting radiation exposure after a nuclear explosion.
Florig HK; Fischhoff B
Health Phys; 2007 May; 92(5):475-83. PubMed ID: 17429306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic reference levels for medical exposure of patients: ICRP guidance and related ICRU quantities.
Rosenstein M
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):528-34. PubMed ID: 18849685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
