276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18404108)
1. A biomechanical study of artificial cervical discs using computer simulation.
Ahn HS; DiAngelo DJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(8):883-92. PubMed ID: 18404108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of the geometry of a ball-and-socket intervertebral prosthesis at the cervical spine: a finite element study.
Rousseau MA; Bonnet X; Skalli W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):E10-4. PubMed ID: 18165735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of the axial, antero-posterior and lateral positions of the center of rotation of a ball-and-socket disc prosthesis on the cervical spine biomechanics.
Galbusera F; Anasetti F; Bellini CM; Costa F; Fornari M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Jun; 25(5):397-401. PubMed ID: 20149505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces.
Rousseau MA; Bradford DS; Bertagnoli R; Hu SS; Lotz JC
Spine J; 2006; 6(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 16651219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanics of the C5-C6 spinal unit before and after placement of a disc prosthesis.
Galbusera F; Fantigrossi A; Raimondi MT; Sassi M; Fornari M; Assietti R
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2006 Nov; 5(4):253-61. PubMed ID: 16514519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Posterior facet load changes in adjacent segments due to moderate and severe degeneration in C5-C6 disc: a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model study.
Hussain M; Natarajan RN; Chaudhary G; An HS; Andersson GB
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 22652989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of cervical spine biomechanics after fixed- and mobile-core artificial disc replacement: a finite element analysis.
Lee SH; Im YJ; Kim KT; Kim YH; Park WM; Kim K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(9):700-8. PubMed ID: 21245792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effects of novel angled cervical disc replacement on facet joint stress].
Bai C; Zhang W; Ling W; Tian Z; Dang X; Wang K
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 26(4):390-5. PubMed ID: 22568314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement.
Snyder JT; Tzermiadianos MN; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Rinella A; Dooris A; Carandang G; Renner SM; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2965-9. PubMed ID: 18091488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical spine biomechanics following implantation of a disc prosthesis.
Galbusera F; Bellini CM; Raimondi MT; Fornari M; Assietti R
Med Eng Phys; 2008 Nov; 30(9):1127-33. PubMed ID: 18359659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.
Aryan HE; Newman CB; Lu DC; Hu SS; Tay BK; Bradford DS; Puttlitz CM; Ames CP
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Facet joint contact pressure is not significantly affected by ProDisc cervical disc arthroplasty in sagittal bending: a single-level cadaveric study.
Bauman JA; Jaumard NV; Guarino BB; Weisshaar CL; Lipschutz DE; Welch WC; Winkelstein BA
Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):949-59. PubMed ID: 22975463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finite element modeling of multi-level cervical spinal segments (C3-C6) and biomechanical analysis of an elastomer-type prosthetic disc.
Ha SK
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 16278091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
