129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18404290)
1. Predicting distal femur bone strength in a murine model of tumor osteolysis.
Mann KA; Lee J; Arrington SA; Damron TA; Allen MJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2008 Jun; 466(6):1271-8. PubMed ID: 18404290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting failure load of the femur with simulated osteolytic defects using noninvasive imaging technique in a simplified load case.
Lee T
Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Apr; 35(4):642-50. PubMed ID: 17286207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Temporal changes in bone mass and mechanical properties in a murine model of tumor osteolysis.
Arrington SA; Schoonmaker JE; Damron TA; Mann KA; Allen MJ
Bone; 2006 Mar; 38(3):359-67. PubMed ID: 16278105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The evaluation of a rat model for the analysis of densitometric and biomechanical properties of tumor-induced osteolysis.
Kurth AH; Wang C; Hayes WC; Shea M
J Orthop Res; 2001 Mar; 19(2):200-5. PubMed ID: 11347691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Osteoporosis and anterior femoral notching in periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures: a biomechanical analysis.
Shawen SB; Belmont PJ; Klemme WR; Topoleski LD; Xenos JS; Orchowski JR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jan; 85(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 12533581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distal skeletal tibia assessed by HR-pQCT is highly correlated with femoral and lumbar vertebra failure loads.
Kroker A; Plett R; Nishiyama KK; McErlain DD; Sandino C; Boyd SK
J Biomech; 2017 Jul; 59():43-49. PubMed ID: 28558915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for predicting fracture loads of the infant femur for injury investigation: an in vitro porcine model.
Pierce MC; Valdevit A; Anderson L; Inoue N; Hauser DL
J Orthop Trauma; 2000 Nov; 14(8):571-6. PubMed ID: 11149504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of pathological fracture of the femoral shaft with an osteolytic lesion using a computed tomography-based nonlinear three-dimensional finite element method.
Chiba D; Mori Y; Sano H; Kishimoto K; Hatori M; Takahashi A; Nakajo S; Itoi E
J Orthop Sci; 2016 Jul; 21(4):530-538. PubMed ID: 27142243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vertebral strength prediction from Bi-Planar dual energy x-ray absorptiometry under anterior compressive force using a finite element model: An in vitro study.
Choisne J; Valiadis JM; Travert C; Kolta S; Roux C; Skalli W
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Nov; 87():190-196. PubMed ID: 30077078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of in situ/in vitro three-dimensional quantitative computed tomography image voxel size on the finite element model of human vertebral cancellous bone.
Lu Y; Engelke K; Glueer CC; Morlock MM; Huber G
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Nov; 228(11):1208-13. PubMed ID: 25500865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite element analysis and CT-based structural rigidity analysis to assess failure load in bones with simulated lytic defects.
Anez-Bustillos L; Derikx LC; Verdonschot N; Calderon N; Zurakowski D; Snyder BD; Nazarian A; Tanck E
Bone; 2014 Jan; 58():160-7. PubMed ID: 24145305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computed tomography-based structural rigidity analysis can assess tumor- and treatment-induced changes in rat bones with metastatic lesions.
Bohanske MS; Momenzadeh K; van der Zwaal P; Hoogwater FJH; Cory E; Biggane P; Snyder BD; Nazarian A
BMC Cancer; 2024 Jun; 24(1):767. PubMed ID: 38926864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of simulated metastatic lytic lesions on proximal femoral strength.
Keyak JH; Kaneko TS; Skinner HB; Hoang BH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Jun; 459():139-45. PubMed ID: 17545762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finite element analysis and computed tomography based structural rigidity analysis of rat tibia with simulated lytic defects.
Rennick JA; Nazarian A; Entezari V; Kimbaris J; Tseng A; Masoudi A; Nayeb-Hashemi H; Vaziri A; Snyder BD
J Biomech; 2013 Oct; 46(15):2701-9. PubMed ID: 23972429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental validation of DXA-based finite element models for prediction of femoral strength.
Dall'Ara E; Eastell R; Viceconti M; Pahr D; Yang L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():17-25. PubMed ID: 27341287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Noninvasive assessments of bone strength.
Bonnick SL
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes; 2007 Dec; 14(6):451-7. PubMed ID: 17982351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of non-invasive assessments of strength of the proximal femur.
Johannesdottir F; Thrall E; Muller J; Keaveny TM; Kopperdahl DL; Bouxsein ML
Bone; 2017 Dec; 105():93-102. PubMed ID: 28739416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element models predict cancellous apparent modulus when tissue modulus is scaled from specimen CT-attenuation.
Bourne BC; van der Meulen MC
J Biomech; 2004 May; 37(5):613-21. PubMed ID: 15046990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relative strength of thoracic vertebrae in axial compression versus flexion.
Buckley JM; Kuo CC; Cheng LC; Loo K; Motherway J; Slyfield C; Deviren V; Ames C
Spine J; 2009 Jun; 9(6):478-85. PubMed ID: 19364678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical model of a high risk impending pathologic fracture of the femur: lesion creation based on clinically implemented scoring systems.
Alexander GE; Gutierrez S; Nayak A; Palumbo BT; Cheong D; Letson GD; Santoni BG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Apr; 28(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 23597777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
