These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Peer review and the nursing literature. Dougherty MC Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry editorial policies and ethical guidelines. Roth KA J Histochem Cytochem; 2006 Feb; 54(2):129-30. PubMed ID: 16418501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Scientific reporting guidelines]. Nylenna M Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Developing new peer reviewers: tips for editors. Ohler L Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(4):7-9. PubMed ID: 16350891 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Someone asked for a "how-to" write editorial. Marrelli TM Home Healthc Nurse; 2010 Mar; 28(3):133-4. PubMed ID: 20308806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hitting the bull's eye rather than shooting yourself between the eyes. Froman RD Res Nurs Health; 2008 Oct; 31(5):399-401. PubMed ID: 18613067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Focus on peer review. Dougherty MC Nurs Res; 2010; 59(6):371. PubMed ID: 21048481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Format, style, and precision. Froman RD Res Nurs Health; 2011 Feb; 34(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 21243654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. If it's too good to be true, it probably is. Kennedy MS Am J Nurs; 2009 Dec; 109(12):7. PubMed ID: 19935148 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. PTJ Adopts a new process for review of RCTs. Craik RL Phys Ther; 2012 May; 92(5):642-3. PubMed ID: 22550307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Consider the source. Mason DJ Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Publication ethics. Hays JC Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Stewards of the discipline: The role of referees and peer review. Broome ME Nurs Outlook; 2010; 58(4):169-70. PubMed ID: 20637926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. On editorial practice and peer review. Shahar E J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Aug; 13(4):699-701. PubMed ID: 17683318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. European Urology: serving our readership through systematic peer review, use of reporting standards, and encouragement of postpublication review. Catto JW; Cooperberg MR; Cornu JN; Gratzke C; Novara G; Shariat SF; Vickers A Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 25175422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research. Freedman JE Cardiovasc Ther; 2008; 26(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 18485131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. European Urology: an American perspective. Freedland SJ Eur Urol; 2012 Jun; 61(6):1197-8. PubMed ID: 22475773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]