These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18404942)

  • 1. Classification of breast computed tomography data.
    Nelson TR; Cerviño LI; Boone JM; Lindfors KK
    Med Phys; 2008 Mar; 35(3):1078-86. PubMed ID: 18404942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A minimum spanning forest based classification method for dedicated breast CT images.
    Pike R; Sechopoulos I; Fei B
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6190-202. PubMed ID: 26520712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry.
    Sechopoulos I; Bliznakova K; Qin X; Fei B; Feng SS
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5050-9. PubMed ID: 22894430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An unsupervised automatic segmentation algorithm for breast tissue classification of dedicated breast computed tomography images.
    Caballo M; Boone JM; Mann R; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2018 Jun; 45(6):2542-2559. PubMed ID: 29676025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dedicated breast CT: fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population.
    Vedantham S; Shi L; Karellas A; O'Connell AM
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7317-28. PubMed ID: 23231281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dataset of patient-derived digital breast phantoms for in silico studies in breast computed tomography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; di Franco F; Varallo A; Bliznakova K; Hernandez AM; Boone JM; Russo P
    Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2682-2693. PubMed ID: 33683711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cupping artifact correction and automated classification for high-resolution dedicated breast CT images.
    Yang X; Wu S; Sechopoulos I; Fei B
    Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6397-406. PubMed ID: 23039675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The quantitative potential for breast tomosynthesis imaging.
    Shafer CM; Samei E; Lo JY
    Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1004-16. PubMed ID: 20384236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of a method for measuring the volumetric breast density from digital mammograms.
    Alonzo-Proulx O; Packard N; Boone JM; Al-Mayah A; Brock KK; Shen SZ; Yaffe MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(11):3027-44. PubMed ID: 20463377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of slice thickness on detectability in breast CT using a prewhitened matched filter and simulated mass lesions.
    Packard NJ; Abbey CK; Yang K; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1818-30. PubMed ID: 22482604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype.
    Sechopoulos I; Feng SS; D'Orsi CJ
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4110-20. PubMed ID: 20879571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the BreastSimulator software platform for breast tomography.
    Mettivier G; Bliznakova K; Sechopoulos I; Boone JM; Di Lillo F; Sarno A; Castriconi R; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 62(16):6446-6466. PubMed ID: 28398906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simulated lesion, human observer performance comparison between thin-section dedicated breast CT images versus computed thick-section simulated projection images of the breast.
    Chen L; Boone JM; Abbey CK; Hargreaves J; Bateni C; Lindfors KK; Yang K; Nosratieh A; Hernandez A; Gazi P
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(8):3347-58. PubMed ID: 25825980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new bias field correction method combining N3 and FCM for improved segmentation of breast density on MRI.
    Lin M; Chan S; Chen JH; Chang D; Nie K; Chen ST; Lin CJ; Shih TC; Nalcioglu O; Su MY
    Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 21361169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Personalized estimates of radiation dose from dedicated breast CT in a diagnostic population and comparison with diagnostic mammography.
    Vedantham S; Shi L; Karellas A; O'Connell AM; Conover DL
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 58(22):7921-36. PubMed ID: 24165162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation.
    Keller BM; Nathan DL; Wang Y; Zheng Y; Gee JC; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4903-17. PubMed ID: 22894417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Updated breast CT dose coefficients (DgN
    Hernandez AM; Becker AE; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1455-1466. PubMed ID: 30661250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histogram partition and interval thresholding for volumetric breast tissue segmentation.
    Chen Z
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jan; 32(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17981016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of breast tissue measurements using magnetic resonance imaging, digital mammography and a mathematical algorithm.
    Lu LJ; Nishino TK; Johnson RF; Nayeem F; Brunder DG; Ju H; Leonard MH; Grady JJ; Khamapirad T
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6903-27. PubMed ID: 23044556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.