These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18405322)

  • 1. 'Fair benefits' accounts of exploitation require a normative principle of fairness: response to Gbadegesin and Wendler, and Emanuel et al.
    Ballantyne A
    Bioethics; 2008 May; 22(4):239-44. PubMed ID: 18405322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to do research fairly in an unjust world.
    Ballantyne AJ
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):26-35. PubMed ID: 20526966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benefits to research subjects in international trials: do they reduce exploitation or increase undue inducement?
    Ballantyne A
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):178-91. PubMed ID: 19046255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From the ideal market to the ideal clinic: constructing a normative standard of fairness for human subjects research.
    Phillips T
    J Med Philos; 2011 Feb; 36(1):79-106. PubMed ID: 21270474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More on benchmarks of fairness: response to Ballantyne.
    Phillips T
    Bioethics; 2012 Jan; 26(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 20459429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Research at the auction block: Problems for the fair benefits approach to international research.
    London AJ; Zollman KJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2010; 40(4):34-45. PubMed ID: 20669781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health research, fair benefits and access to medicines.
    Lertsithichai P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Apr; 89(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 16696406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using the Emanuel et al. framework to assess ethical issues raised by a biomedical research ethics committee in South Africa.
    Tsoka-Gwegweni JM; Wassenaar DR
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):36-45. PubMed ID: 25747689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple forms of exploitation in international research: the need for multiple standards of fairness.
    Snyder J
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):40-1. PubMed ID: 20526969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the relation between trust and fairness in environmental risk management.
    Earle TC; Siegrist M
    Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1395-414. PubMed ID: 18631299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation.
    De Cremer D; Tyler TR
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 May; 92(3):639-49. PubMed ID: 17484547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. HIV international clinical research: exploitation and risk.
    Ballantyne A
    Bioethics; 2005 Oct; 19(5-6):476-91. PubMed ID: 16425485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protecting communities in health research from exploitation.
    Gbadegesin S; Wendler D
    Bioethics; 2006 Sep; 20(5):248-53. PubMed ID: 17100008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. International research and just sharing of benefits in Mexico.
    Páez R; Garcia De Alba JE
    Dev World Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 18302542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Applying justice in clinical trials for diverse populations.
    Tilburt J; Ford JG; Howerton MW; Gary TL; Lai GY; Bolen S; Baffi C; Wilson RF; Tanpitukpongse TP; Powe NR; Bass EB; Sugarman J
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 17715253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Should post-trial provision of beneficial experimental interventions be mandatory in developing countries?
    Zong Z
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Mar; 34(3):188-92. PubMed ID: 18316461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Substitutes for procedural fairness: prototypical leaders are endorsed whether they are fair or not.
    Ullrich J; Christ O; van Dick R
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jan; 94(1):235-44. PubMed ID: 19186908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of societal benefits and fairness concerns among decision makers and decision recipients.
    Heuer L; Penrod S; Kattan A
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Dec; 31(6):573-610. PubMed ID: 17245632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The fair benefits approach revisited.
    Lie RK
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2010; 40(4):3. PubMed ID: 20669771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and judgments of an authority's responsibility.
    Brockner J; Fishman AY; Reb J; Goldman B; Spiegel S; Garden C
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Nov; 92(6):1657-71. PubMed ID: 18020803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.