312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18405449)
1. Hydrodissection for preservation of neurovascular bundle during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Guru KA; Perlmutter AE; Butt ZM; Peabody JO
Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):4000-3. PubMed ID: 18405449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hydrodissection of neurovascular bundles during open radical prostatectomy improves postoperative potency.
Patel MI; Spernat D; Lopez-Corona E
J Urol; 2011 Jul; 186(1):233-7. PubMed ID: 21575963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical safety and feasibility of a newly developed, simple algorithm for decision-making on neurovascular bundle preservation in radical prostatectomy.
Hashimoto K; Hisasue S; Masumori N; Kobayashi K; Kato R; Fukuta F; Takahashi A; Hasegawa T; Tsukamoto T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2010 Apr; 40(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 19959505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The New York University nerve sparing algorithm decreases the rate of positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Shah O; Robbins DA; Melamed J; Lepor H
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2147-52. PubMed ID: 12771737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic assisted laparoscopic sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy: initial experience.
Kaouk JH; Desai MM; Abreu SC; Papay F; Gill IS
J Urol; 2003 Sep; 170(3):909-12. PubMed ID: 12913728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Significance of neurovascular bundle formation observed on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging regarding postoperative erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Lee SE; Hong SK; Han JH; Han BK; Yu JH; Jeong SJ; Byun SS; Lee HJ
Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):510-4. PubMed ID: 17382155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach.
Joseph JV; Rosenbaum R; Madeb R; Erturk E; Patel HR
J Urol; 2006 Mar; 175(3 Pt 1):945-50; discussion 951. PubMed ID: 16469589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Postoperative urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Carlsson S; Nilsson A; Wiklund PN
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2006; 40(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 16608806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Link BA; Nelson R; Josephson DY; Yoshida JS; Crocitto LE; Kawachi MH; Wilson TG
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):928-32. PubMed ID: 18635217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation.
Chien GW; Mikhail AA; Orvieto MA; Zagaja GP; Sokoloff MH; Brendler CB; Shalhav AL
Urology; 2005 Aug; 66(2):419-23. PubMed ID: 16040100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes.
Kowalczyk KJ; Huang AC; Hevelone ND; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Ulmer WD; Kaplan JR; Patel S; Nguyen PL; Hu JC
Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):536-47. PubMed ID: 21620561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.
Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation.
Zorn KC; Gofrit ON; Orvieto MA; Mikhail AA; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL
Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):755-62; discussion 763. PubMed ID: 17084520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Tewari AK; Srivastava A; Huang MW; Robinson BD; Shevchuk MM; Durand M; Sooriakumaran P; Grover S; Yadav R; Mishra N; Mohan S; Brooks DC; Shaikh N; Khanna A; Leung R
BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):984-92. PubMed ID: 21917101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective evaluation of 600 cases.
Rozet F; Galiano M; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Cathala N; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):908-11. PubMed ID: 16093985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L
Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: initial experience at Roswell Park Cancer Institute.
Guru KA; Kim HL; Piacente PM; Mohler JL
Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):469-74. PubMed ID: 17382147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association of surgeon subjective characterization of nerve sparing quality with potency following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Levinson AW; Pavlovich CP; Ward NT; Link RE; Mettee LZ; Su LM
J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1510-4. PubMed ID: 18295270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving the preservation of the urethral sphincter and neurovascular bundles during open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Montorsi F; Salonia A; Suardi N; Gallina A; Zanni G; Briganti A; Deho' F; Naspro R; Farina E; Rigatti P
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):938-45. PubMed ID: 16257111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
