638 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18405813)
1. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
Shafiee R; Korn EL; Pearson H; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 18405813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Facial attractiveness: a longitudinal study.
Tatarunaite E; Playle R; Hood K; Shaw W; Richmond S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):676-82; quiz 755. PubMed ID: 15953892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are ratings of dentofacial attractiveness influenced by dentofacial midline discrepancies?
Shyagali TR; Chandralekha B; Bhayya DP; Kumar S; Balasubramanyam G
Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 19113072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ranking facial attractiveness.
Knight H; Keith O
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 16043472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of orthodontic treatment need: a comparison of study models and facial photographs.
Sherlock JM; Cobourne MT; McDonald F
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 36(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18205636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. . Facial attractiveness: ranking of end-of-treatment facial photographs by pairs of Chinese and US orthodontists.
Xu TM; Korn EL; Liu Y; Oh HS; Lee KH; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 18617106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics.
Spyropoulos MN; Halazonetis DJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 11343017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment.
Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of sagittal and oblique smiling profiles in evaluating facial esthetics.
Yang X; Yi Y; Yang S; Xue C; Wang Y; Chen M; Han X; Bai D
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 26(2):532-6. PubMed ID: 25668109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions.
Abu Arqoub SH; Al-Khateeb SN
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 20558590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 2: attractiveness of the frontal facial smile in extraction and nonextraction outcomes.
Meyer AH; Woods MG; Manton DJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 24582021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Chinese and US orthodontists' averaged evaluations of "facial attractiveness" from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
Liu Y; Korn EL; Oh HS; Pearson H; Xu TM; Baumrind S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):621-34. PubMed ID: 19409345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aesthetic evaluation of profile incisor inclination.
Ghaleb N; Bouserhal J; Bassil-Nassif N
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Jun; 33(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 20716642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation Between Cephalometric Measures and End-of-Treatment Facial Attractiveness.
Yu XN; Bai D; Feng X; Liu YH; Chen WJ; Li S; Han GL; Jiang RP; Xu TM
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):405-9. PubMed ID: 26872281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Q-sort assessment vs visual analog scale in the evaluation of smile esthetics.
Schabel BJ; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4 Suppl):S61-71. PubMed ID: 19362268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles.
Işiksal E; Hazar S; Akyalçin S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jan; 129(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 16443472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians.
Cochrane SM; Cunningham SJ; Hunt NP
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 10895644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
Shell TL; Woods MG
Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity and reliability of facial profile evaluation in vertical and horizontal dimensions from lateral cephalograms and lateral photographs.
Michiels G; Sather AH
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 8006483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
