BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

638 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18405813)

  • 21. Panel perception of change in facial aesthetics following orthodontic treatment in adolescents.
    Kiekens RM; Maltha JC; van 't Hof MA; Straatman H; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 18263888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance.
    Sloss EA; Southard KA; Qian F; Stock SE; Mann KR; Meyer DL; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18405814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the aesthetic component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need by Swedish orthodontists.
    Johansson AM; Follin ME
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Apr; 27(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 15817623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of the posed smile in overall facial esthetics.
    Havens DC; McNamara JA; Sigler LM; Baccetti T
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Mar; 80(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 19905858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of the gingival display on posed smile with different facial forms: a comparison of dentists and patients concepts.
    Akhare PJ; Daga A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 23422598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cephalometric measures as indicators of facial attractiveness.
    Tulloch C; Phillips C; Dann C
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 8301165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of computer-aided anteroposterior maxillary incisor movement on ratings of facial attractiveness.
    Schlosser JB; Preston CB; Lampasso J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15643410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery.
    Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics.
    Roden-Johnson D; Gallerano R; English J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 15775949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perception of facial attractiveness by patients, peers, and professionals.
    Phillips C; Griffin T; Bennett E
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 9081998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Observable deviation of the facial and anterior tooth midlines.
    Cardash HS; Ormanier Z; Laufer BZ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):282-5. PubMed ID: 12644804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Buccal corridors and smile esthetics.
    Moore T; Southard KA; Casko JS; Qian F; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):208-13; quiz 261. PubMed ID: 15750540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Configuration of facial features influences subjective evaluation of facial type.
    Karavaka SM; Halazonetis DJ; Spyropoulos MN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 18249295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Subjective vs objective evaluations of smile esthetics.
    Schabel BJ; Franchi L; Baccetti T; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4 Suppl):S72-9. PubMed ID: 19362269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population.
    Macías Gago AB; Romero Maroto M; Crego A
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 21447783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ratings of profile attractiveness after functional appliance treatment.
    O'Neill K; Harkness M; Knight R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Oct; 118(4):371-6; discussion 377. PubMed ID: 11029730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadolescent borderline patients.
    Germeç D; Taner TU
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):539-49. PubMed ID: 18405818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ranking dental aesthetics and thresholds of treatment need: a comparison between patients, parents, and dentists.
    Hamdan AM; Al-Omari IK; Al-Bitar ZB
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):366-71. PubMed ID: 17702796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of mandibular prominence on facial attractiveness.
    Johnston C; Hunt O; Burden D; Stevenson M; Hepper P
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Apr; 27(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 15817618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.