These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

637 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18405813)

  • 41. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Assessing soft-tissue characteristics of facial asymmetry with photographs.
    Lee MS; Chung DH; Lee JW; Cha KS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 20620830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions.
    Todd SA; Hammond P; Hutton T; Cochrane S; Cunningham S
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 15961568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index.
    Krishnan V; Daniel ST; Lazar D; Asok A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):515-23. PubMed ID: 18405815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Smile esthetics from patients' perspectives for faces of varying attractiveness.
    Chang CA; Fields HW; Beck FM; Springer NC; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel S; Christensen JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):e171-80. PubMed ID: 21967955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Influence of dental esthetics on social perceptions of adolescents judged by peers.
    Henson ST; Lindauer SJ; Gardner WG; Shroff B; Tufekci E; Best AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 21889084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Tooth shape preferences in an esthetic smile.
    Anderson KM; Behrents RG; McKinney T; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 16214627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients.
    Stephens CK; Boley JC; Behrents RG; Alexander RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):450-7. PubMed ID: 16214626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Photographic soft-tissue profile analysis in children at 6 years of age.
    Dimaggio FR; Ciusa V; Sforza C; Ferrario VF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):475-80. PubMed ID: 17920500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Esthetic effect of orthodontic appliances on a smiling face with and without a missing maxillary first premolar.
    Berto PM; Lima CS; Lenza MA; Faber J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4 Suppl):S55-60. PubMed ID: 19362267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment.
    Baker BW; Woods MG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(2):108-20. PubMed ID: 11482289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Influence on smile attractiveness of the smile arc in conjunction with gingival display.
    Kaya B; Uyar R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Oct; 144(4):541-7. PubMed ID: 24075662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc.
    Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):98-111. PubMed ID: 11500650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Changes in smile parameters as perceived by orthodontists, dentists, artists, and laypeople.
    Gul-e-Erum ; Fida M
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 18575307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Facial esthetics in adolescents and its relationship to "ideal" ratios and angles.
    Kiekens RM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; van 't Hof MA; van 't Hof BE; Straatman H; Maltha JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):188.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18249280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Smile attractiveness related to buccal corridor space in 3 different facial types: A perception of 3 ethnic groups of Malaysians.
    Nimbalkar S; Oh YY; Mok RY; Tioh JY; Yew KJ; Patil PG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):252-256. PubMed ID: 29551374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of facial attractiveness for patients with malocclusion: a machine-learning technique employing Procrustes.
    Yu X; Liu B; Pei Y; Xu T
    Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):410-6. PubMed ID: 24090123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Computer-based evaluation of gender identification and morphologic classification of tooth face and arch forms.
    Berksun S; Hasanreisoğlu U; Gökdeniz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):578-84. PubMed ID: 12488849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The effect of axial midline angulation on dental esthetics.
    Thomas JL; Hayes C; Zawaideh S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):359-64. PubMed ID: 12940555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.