154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18405816)
1. Esthetic impact of premolar extraction and nonextraction treatments on Korean borderline patients.
Lim HJ; Ko KT; Hwang HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):524-31. PubMed ID: 18405816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The perceived impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on matched samples of African American patients.
Scott SH; Johnston LE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):352-60. PubMed ID: 10474110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on Caucasian patients.
Bowman SJ; Johnston LE
Angle Orthod; 2000 Feb; 70(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 10730669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment outcomes for borderline Chinese patients.
Xu TM; Liu Y; Yang MZ; Huang W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):672-7. PubMed ID: 16679208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes in Class I borderline patients treated with extraction and nonextraction modalities.
Yashwant V A; K R; Arumugam E
Dental Press J Orthod; 2016; 21(4):50-9. PubMed ID: 27653264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Facial changes in extraction and nonextraction patients.
Boley JC; Pontier JP; Smith S; Fulbright M
Angle Orthod; 1998 Dec; 68(6):539-46. PubMed ID: 9851352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients.
Stephens CK; Boley JC; Behrents RG; Alexander RG; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):450-7. PubMed ID: 16214626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadolescent borderline patients.
Germeç D; Taner TU
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):539-49. PubMed ID: 18405818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions.
Erdinc AE; Nanda RS; Dandajena TC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 17826600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of facial profiles in extraction and nonextraction treatment.
James RD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Sep; 114(3):265-76. PubMed ID: 9743131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in Class II, division 1 cases treated with and without extractions.
Bishara SE; Cummins DM; Jakobsen JR; Zaher AR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jan; 107(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 7817959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in nonextraction, 2 maxillary premolar extraction, and 4 premolar extraction protocols with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
Akinci Cansunar H; Uysal T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):595-602. PubMed ID: 24785923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Esthetic impact of tooth extraction in Pakistani patients.
Hassan S; Shaikh A; Fida M
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2014; 26(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 25671923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term comparison of extraction and nonextraction alternatives in matched samples of African American patients.
Hagler BL; Lupini J; Johnston LE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Oct; 114(4):393-403. PubMed ID: 9790323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment.
Bishara SE; Cummins DM; Zaher AR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jan; 111(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 9009919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of nonextraction and extraction orthodontic treatments on smile esthetics for different malocclusions.
Cheng HC; Wang YC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jan; 153(1):81-86. PubMed ID: 29287659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dental and soft tissue changes following extraction of second premolars in females with bimaxillary protrusion: A retrospective study.
Alqahtani ND; Alqasir A; Al-Jewair T; Almoammar K; Albarakati SF
Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Aug; 23(8):1110-1119. PubMed ID: 32788489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Esthetic perception of changes in facial profile resulting from orthodontic treatment with extraction of premolars: A systematic review.
Iared W; Koga da Silva EM; Iared W; Rufino Macedo C
J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Jan; 148(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 27771001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 2: attractiveness of the frontal facial smile in extraction and nonextraction outcomes.
Meyer AH; Woods MG; Manton DJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 24582021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term profile changes associated with successfully treated extraction and nonextraction Class II Division 1 malocclusions.
Zierhut EC; Joondeph DR; Artun J; Little RM
Angle Orthod; 2000 Jun; 70(3):208-19. PubMed ID: 10926430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
