BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18405938)

  • 1. Biofilm processes in biologically active carbon water purification.
    Simpson DR
    Water Res; 2008 Jun; 42(12):2839-48. PubMed ID: 18405938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Structure of nitrifying biofilms in a high-rate trickling filter designed for potable water pre-treatment.
    van den Akker B; Holmes M; Pearce P; Cromar NJ; Fallowfield HJ
    Water Res; 2011 May; 45(11):3489-98. PubMed ID: 21543100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of biological activated carbon (BAC) and membrane bioreactor (MBR) for pollutants removal in drinking water treatment.
    Tian JY; Chen ZL; Liang H; Li X; Wang ZZ; Li GB
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(6):1515-23. PubMed ID: 19759454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A review: Potential and challenges of biologically activated carbon to remove natural organic matter in drinking water purification process.
    Korotta-Gamage SM; Sathasivan A
    Chemosphere; 2017 Jan; 167():120-138. PubMed ID: 27716585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling the development of biofilm density including active bacteria, inert biomass, and extracellular polymeric substances.
    Laspidou CS; Rittmann BE
    Water Res; 2004; 38(14-15):3349-61. PubMed ID: 15276752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. AC/O3-BAC processes for removing refractory and hazardous pollutants in raw water.
    Li L; Zhu W; Zhang P; Zhang Q; Zhang Z
    J Hazard Mater; 2006 Jul; 135(1-3):129-33. PubMed ID: 16386361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study on control of micro-pollutants by BAC filtration.
    Zhang ZH; Shao L
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(3):677-82. PubMed ID: 18725738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hybrid process of BAC and sMBR for treating polluted raw water.
    Tian JY; Chen ZL; Yang YL; Liang H; Nan J; Wang ZZ; Li GB
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Dec; 100(24):6243-9. PubMed ID: 19682892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simulation of biofilm formation at different assimilable organic carbon concentrations under lower flow velocity condition.
    Tsai YP
    J Basic Microbiol; 2005; 45(6):475-85. PubMed ID: 16304710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhancing pozzolana colonization by As(III)-oxidizing bacteria for bioremediation purposes.
    Challan Belval S; Garnier F; Michel C; Chautard S; Breeze D; Garrido F
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2009 Sep; 84(3):565-73. PubMed ID: 19547967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biofilm/membrane filtration for reclamation and reuse of rural wastewaters.
    Hyun KS; Lee SJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(11):2145-52. PubMed ID: 19494453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization of bacterial biofilm communities in tertiary treatment processes for wastewater reclamation and reuse.
    Shoji T; Ochi S; Ozaki M
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(5):1023-30. PubMed ID: 18824800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating the fate of saxitoxins in biologically active water treatment plant filters.
    Kayal N; Newcombe G; Ho L
    Environ Toxicol; 2008 Dec; 23(6):751-5. PubMed ID: 18442074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A continuous stirred hydrogen-based polyvinyl chloride membrane biofilm reactor for the treatment of nitrate contaminated drinking water.
    Xia S; Zhang Y; Zhong F
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Dec; 100(24):6223-8. PubMed ID: 19656675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biofilm responses to ageing and to a high phosphate load in a bench-scale drinking water system.
    Batté M; Koudjonou B; Laurent P; Mathieu L; Coallier J; Prévost M
    Water Res; 2003 Mar; 37(6):1351-61. PubMed ID: 12598197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of seven kinds of drinking water treatment processes to enhance organic material removal: a pilot test.
    Chen C; Zhang X; He W; Lu W; Han H
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Aug; 382(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 17521706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of four methods to assess biofilm development.
    Alnnasouri M; Dagot C; Pons MN
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(3):432-9. PubMed ID: 21278464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combined use of molecular biology taxonomy, Raman spectrometry, and ESEM imaging to study natural biofilms grown on filter materials at waterworks.
    Schwartz T; Jungfer C; Heissler S; Friedrich F; Faubel W; Obst U
    Chemosphere; 2009 Sep; 77(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 19647286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rapid and reliable quantification of biofilm weight and nitrogen content of biofilm attached to polystyrene beads.
    Delatolla R; Berk D; Tufenkji N
    Water Res; 2008 Jun; 42(12):3082-8. PubMed ID: 18433829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Presence of biofilms on ultrafiltration membrane surfaces increases the quality of permeate produced during ultra-low pressure gravity-driven membrane filtration.
    Derlon N; Mimoso J; Klein T; Koetzsch S; Morgenroth E
    Water Res; 2014 Sep; 60():164-173. PubMed ID: 24859194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.