503 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18406078)
1. Effect of contingent auditory stimuli on concurrent schedule performance: an alternative punisher to electric shock.
Reed P; Yoshino T
Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 18406078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of signaled reinforcement on rats' fixed-interval responding.
Reed P
J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 May; 79(3):367-82. PubMed ID: 12908763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Facilitation of instrumental behavior by a Pavlovian appetitive conditioned stimulus.
Lovibond PF
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1983 Jul; 9(3):225-47. PubMed ID: 6153052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Choice and contingency in the development of behavioral autonomy during instrumental conditioning.
Kosaki Y; Dickinson A
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Jul; 36(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 20658864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Response rate and sensitivity to the molar feedback function relating response and reinforcement rate on VI+ schedules of reinforcement.
Reed P
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):428-39. PubMed ID: 17924790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence of interaction between deprivation effects and stimulus control.
Powell RW
J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Jul; 16(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 5142390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stimulus change as a factor in response maintenance with free food available.
Osborne SR; Shelby M
J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Jul; 24(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 1202121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stimulus change dis-habituates operant responding supported by water reinforcers.
McSweeney FK; Kowal BP; Murphy ES; Wiediger RS
Behav Processes; 2005 Nov; 70(3):235-46. PubMed ID: 16112816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Resistance to change varies inversely with reinforcement context.
Grace RC; Arantes J; Berg ME
Behav Processes; 2012 Jul; 90(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 22503966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 60 Hz electric fields and incandescent light as aversive stimuli controlling the behavior of rats responding under concurrent schedules of reinforcement.
Stern S; Laties VG
Bioelectromagnetics; 1998; 19(4):210-21. PubMed ID: 9581964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of orbital prefrontal cortex lesions on performance on a progressive ratio schedule: implications for models of inter-temporal choice.
Kheramin S; Body S; Herrera FM; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E; Deakin JF; Anderson IM
Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 156(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 15474659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effects of change-over-delay in the signal-key procedure].
Manabe K; Kawashima T
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1982 Dec; 53(5):304-7. PubMed ID: 7169710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Within-subject effects of number of trials in rat conditioning procedures.
Gottlieb DA; Rescorla RA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Apr; 36(2):217-31. PubMed ID: 20384402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Positive contrast in the rat: a test of the additivity theory.
Nallan GB; McCoy DF
Am J Psychol; 1979 Sep; 92(3):449-61. PubMed ID: 517676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploring a concurrent-chains paradox: decreasing preference as an initial link is shortened.
Mazur JE
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jan; 31(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 15656723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Antecedent reinforcement contingencies in the stimulus control of an auditory discrimination.
Pierrel R; Blue S
J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Nov; 10(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 6080833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An application of the active time model to multiple concurrent variable-interval schedules.
Brown EK; Cleaveland JM
Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):250-5. PubMed ID: 19038316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of signaling reinforcement on resistance to change in a multiple schedule.
Bell MC; Seip KM; Fitzsimmons KS
Behav Processes; 2007 Jan; 74(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 17071019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human performance on a two-alternative rapid-acquisition choice task.
Lie C; Harper DN; Hunt M
Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 19015013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of repeated acquisitions and extinctions on response rate and pattern.
Guilhardi P; Yi L; Church RM
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):322-8. PubMed ID: 16834499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
