393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18406103)
1. Successful prevalidation of the slug mucosal irritation test to assess the eye irritation potency of chemicals.
Adriaens E; Bytheway H; De Wever B; Eschrich D; Guest R; Hansen E; Vanparys P; Schoeters G; Warren N; Weltens R; Whittingham A; Remon JP
Toxicol In Vitro; 2008 Aug; 22(5):1285-96. PubMed ID: 18406103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Refinement of the Slug Mucosal Irritation test as an alternative screening test for eye irritation.
Adriaens E; Dhondt MM; Remon JP
Toxicol In Vitro; 2005 Feb; 19(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 15582359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Slug species- and population-specific effects on the end points of the Slug Mucosal Irritation test.
Dhondt MM; Adriaens E; Pinceel J; Jordaens K; Backeljau T; Remon JP
Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Jun; 20(4):448-57. PubMed ID: 16226427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of an alternative mucosal irritation test using slugs.
Adriaens E; Remon JP
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2002 Jul; 182(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 12140180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Short Time Exposure (STE) test for predicting eye irritation potential: intra-laboratory reproducibility and correspondence to globally harmonized system (GHS) and EU eye irritation classification for 109 chemicals.
Takahashi Y; Hayashi K; Abo T; Koike M; Sakaguchi H; Nishiyama N
Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Oct; 25(7):1425-34. PubMed ID: 21513790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CON4EI: Slug Mucosal Irritation (SMI) test method for hazard identification and labelling of serious eye damaging and eye irritating chemicals.
Adriaens E; Guest R; Willoughby JA; Fochtman P; Kandarova H; Verstraelen S; Van Rompay AR
Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Jun; 49():77-89. PubMed ID: 28870540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An alternative test battery in detecting ocular irritancy of agrochemicals.
Tavaszi J; Budai P; Pálovics A; Kismányoki A
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):891-5. PubMed ID: 19226840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prevalidation of a new in vitro reconstituted human cornea model to assess the eye irritating potential of chemicals.
Van Goethem F; Adriaens E; Alépée N; Straube F; De Wever B; Cappadoro M; Catoire S; Hansen E; Wolf A; Vanparys P
Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Feb; 20(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 16019187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A proposed eye irritation testing strategy to reduce and replace in vivo studies using Bottom-Up and Top-Down approaches.
Scott L; Eskes C; Hoffmann S; Adriaens E; Alepée N; Bufo M; Clothier R; Facchini D; Faller C; Guest R; Harbell J; Hartung T; Kamp H; Varlet BL; Meloni M; McNamee P; Osborne R; Pape W; Pfannenbecker U; Prinsen M; Seaman C; Spielmann H; Stokes W; Trouba K; Berghe CV; Goethem FV; Vassallo M; Vinardell P; Zuang V
Toxicol In Vitro; 2010 Feb; 24(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19490935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of eye and skin irritation of arginine-derivative surfactants using different in vitro endpoints as alternatives to the in vivo assays.
Martinez V; Corsini E; Mitjans M; Pinazo A; Vinardell MP
Toxicol Lett; 2006 Jul; 164(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 16472949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction models for eye irritation potential based on endpoints of the HETCAM and neutral red uptake tests.
Worth AP; Cronin MT
In Vitr Mol Toxicol; 2001; 14(3):143-56. PubMed ID: 11846988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Human hemoglobin denaturation as an alternative to the Draize test for predicting eye irritancy of surfactants.
Mitjans M; Infante MR; Vinardell MP
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Nov; 52(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 18602964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation study on the Ocular Irritection assay for eye irritation testing.
Eskes C; Hoffmann S; Facchini D; Ulmer R; Wang A; Flego M; Vassallo M; Bufo M; van Vliet E; d'Abrosca F; Wilt N
Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Aug; 28(5):1046-65. PubMed ID: 24637247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The slug mucosal irritation (SMI) assay: development of a screening tool for the evaluation of ocular discomfort caused by shampoos.
Lenoir J; Claerhout I; Kestelyn P; Klomp A; Remon JP; Adriaens E
Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Dec; 25(8):1919-25. PubMed ID: 21741469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An interlaboratory study of the short time exposure (STE) test using SIRC cells for predicting eye irritation potential.
Takahashi Y; Hayashi T; Koike M; Sakaguchi H; Kuwahara H; Nishiyama N
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2010 Jun; 29(2):77-90. PubMed ID: 20178401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-stage bottom-up tiered approach combining several alternatives for identification of eye irritation potential of chemicals including insoluble or volatile substances.
Hayashi K; Mori T; Abo T; Ooshima K; Hayashi T; Komano T; Takahashi Y; Sakaguchi H; Takatsu A; Nishiyama N
Toxicol In Vitro; 2012 Oct; 26(7):1199-208. PubMed ID: 22743076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of red blood cell method in rat and calves blood as alternatives of Draize eye irritation test.
Lagarto A; Vega R; Vega Y; Guerra I; González R
Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Jun; 20(4):529-33. PubMed ID: 16293391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Cytotoxicity of chemicals used in household products: estimation of eye irritating potency of 25 chemicals tested during 1991-1996].
Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Kokuritsu Iyakuhin Shokuhin Eisei Kenkyusho Hokoku; 1997; (115):130-4. PubMed ID: 9641827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro skin irritation testing on reconstituted human epidermis: reproducibility for 50 chemicals tested with two protocols.
Tornier C; Rosdy M; Maibach HI
Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Jun; 20(4):401-16. PubMed ID: 16229985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hen egg chorioallantoic membrane bioassay: an in vitro alternative to draize eye irritation test for pesticide screening.
Kishore AS; Surekha PA; Sekhar PV; Srinivas A; Murthy PB
Int J Toxicol; 2008 Nov; 27(6):449-53. PubMed ID: 19482824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
