526 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18406188)
1. Screening of diabetic retinopathy: effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography.
Aptel F; Denis P; Rouberol F; Thivolet C
Diabetes Metab; 2008 Jun; 34(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18406188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease.
Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.
Chow SP; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Katalinic P; Hock K; Tolson A; Kirby R; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 16650680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of single-field nonmydriatic digital fundus image in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Suansilpong A; Rawdaree P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1397-403. PubMed ID: 18843870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal imaging for screening diabetic retinopathy.
Lopez-Bastida J; Cabrera-Lopez F; Serrano-Aguilar P
Diabet Med; 2007 Apr; 24(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 17298591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography.
Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers RJ; Grosvenor DM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 12140027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in rural area using single-field, digital fundus images.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Wongcumchang N; Surawongsin P; Panyawatananukul E; Tiensuwan M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Feb; 88(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 15962667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by one-field, non-mydriatic, 45 degrees digital photography is inadequate.
Kuo HK; Hsieh HH; Liu RT
Ophthalmologica; 2005; 219(5):292-6. PubMed ID: 16123556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diabetic retinopathy screening using digital non-mydriatic fundus photography and automated image analysis.
Hansen AB; Hartvig NV; Jensen MS; Borch-Johnsen K; Lund-Andersen H; Larsen M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):666-72. PubMed ID: 15606461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening for sight threatening diabetic retinopathy using non-mydriatic retinal camera in a primary care setting: to dilate or not to dilate?
Baeza M; Orozco-Beltrán D; Gil-Guillen VF; Pedrera V; Ribera MC; Pertusa S; Merino J
Int J Clin Pract; 2009 Mar; 63(3):433-8. PubMed ID: 19222628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: the utility of nonmydriatic retinal photography in Egyptian adults.
Penman AD; Saaddine JB; Hegazy M; Sous ES; Ali MA; Brechner RJ; Herman WH; Engelgau MM; Klein R
Diabet Med; 1998 Sep; 15(9):783-7. PubMed ID: 9737809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can we predict which patients are at risk of having an ungradeable digital image for screening for diabetic retinopathy?
Murgatroyd H; Cox A; Ellingford A; Ellis JD; Macewen CJ; Leese GP
Eye (Lond); 2008 Mar; 22(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 17024219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.
Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Noble J; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 154(3):549-559.e2. PubMed ID: 22626617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is screening with digital imaging using one retinal view adequate?
Herbert HM; Jordan K; Flanagan DW
Eye (Lond); 2003 May; 17(4):497-500. PubMed ID: 12802350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using a digital non-mydriatic camera compared with standard 35-mm stereo colour transparencies.
Hansen AB; Sander B; Larsen M; Kleener J; Borch-Johnsen K; Klein R; Lund-Andersen H
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):656-65. PubMed ID: 15606460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by general practitioners: ophthalmoscopy or retinal photography as 35 mm colour transparencies?
Owens DR; Gibbins RL; Lewis PA; Wall S; Allen JC; Morton R
Diabet Med; 1998 Feb; 15(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 9507921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal images in grading diabetic retinopathy.
Saari JM; Summanen P; Kivelä T; Saari KM
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Apr; 82(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 15043527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of digital fundus photography in diabetic retinopathy screening. Digital Diabetic Screening Group (DDSG).
Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers R
Diabetes Technol Ther; 1999; 1(4):477-87. PubMed ID: 11484714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic screening for diabetic retinopathy with a digital fundus camera following pupillary dilatation in a university diabetes department.
Deb-Joardar N; Germain N; Thuret G; Garcin A-; Manoli P; Defreyn A; Gain P; Estour B
Diabet Med; 2007 Mar; 24(3):303-7. PubMed ID: 17263768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using digital colour photography and oral fluorescein angiography.
Newsom R; Moate B; Casswell T
Eye (Lond); 2000 Aug; 14 ( Pt 4)():579-82. PubMed ID: 11040903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
