These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18406476)

  • 21. Salivary alpha-amylase levels and rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game.
    Takagishi H; Fujii T; Kameshima S; Koizumi M; Takahashi T
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2009; 30(5):643-6. PubMed ID: 20035253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Unfairness sensitivity and social decision-making in individuals with alcohol dependence: a preliminary study.
    Brevers D; Noël X; Ermer E; Dabiri D; Verbanck P; Kornreich C
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2013 Dec; 133(2):772-5. PubMed ID: 24021763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Superior temporal gyrus and insula provide response and outcome-dependent information during assessment and action selection in a decision-making situation.
    Paulus MP; Feinstein JS; Leland D; Simmons AN
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(2):607-15. PubMed ID: 15784440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influences of State and Trait Affect on Behavior, Feedback-Related Negativity, and P3b in the Ultimatum Game.
    Riepl K; Mussel P; Osinsky R; Hewig J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146358. PubMed ID: 26742103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Preference and strategy in proposer's prosocial giving in the ultimatum game.
    Inaba M; Inoue Y; Akutsu S; Takahashi N; Yamagishi T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193877. PubMed ID: 29505587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Chimpanzees are rational maximizers in an ultimatum game.
    Jensen K; Call J; Tomasello M
    Science; 2007 Oct; 318(5847):107-9. PubMed ID: 17916736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sex and the money--How gender stereotypes modulate economic decision-making: An ERP study.
    Fabre EF; Causse M; Pesciarelli F; Cacciari C
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():221-32. PubMed ID: 26102185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Beauty matters: social preferences in a three-person ultimatum game.
    Ma Q; Hu Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125806. PubMed ID: 25951138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pro-inflammatory cytokine predicts reduced rejection of unfair financial offers.
    Ohira H; Osumi T; Matsunaga M; Yamakawa K
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2013; 34(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 23524623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The neural correlate of mid-value offers in ultimatum game.
    Zhong X; Wang R; Huang S; Chen J; Chen H; Qu C
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220622. PubMed ID: 31430295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intuition and deliberation: two systems for strategizing in the brain.
    Kuo WJ; Sjöström T; Chen YP; Wang YH; Huang CY
    Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5926):519-22. PubMed ID: 19390048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Five-year-olds understand fair as equal in a mini-ultimatum game.
    Wittig M; Jensen K; Tomasello M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Oct; 116(2):324-37. PubMed ID: 23917161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The impact of facial attractiveness and alleged personality traits on fairness decisions in the ultimatum game: Evidence from ERPs.
    Li T; Liang Z; Yuan Y; Sommer W; Li W
    Biol Psychol; 2024 Jul; 190():108809. PubMed ID: 38718883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The near-miss effect in slot-machine gambling: modulation of feedback-related negativity by subjective value.
    Luo Q; Wang Y; Qu C
    Neuroreport; 2011 Dec; 22(18):989-93. PubMed ID: 22045258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Brain substrates of social decision-making in dual diagnosis: cocaine dependence and personality disorders.
    Verdejo-Garcia A; Verdejo-Román J; Albein-Urios N; Martínez-González JM; Soriano-Mas C
    Addict Biol; 2017 Mar; 22(2):457-467. PubMed ID: 26442666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lower dorsal striatum activation in association with neuroticism during the acceptance of unfair offers.
    Servaas MN; Aleman A; Marsman JB; Renken RJ; Riese H; Ormel J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 15(3):537-52. PubMed ID: 25720857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predicting outcomes of decisions in the brain.
    Polezzi D; Lotto L; Daum I; Sartori G; Rumiati R
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 187(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 17935798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Being the chosen one: social inclusion modulates decisions in the ultimatum game. An ERP study.
    Falco A; Albinet C; Rattat AC; Paul I; Fabre E
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Feb; 14(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30608613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
    Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perceived relative social status and cognitive load influence acceptance of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game.
    Harris A; Young A; Hughson L; Green D; Doan SN; Hughson E; Reed CL
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227717. PubMed ID: 31917806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.