These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18406513)

  • 1. Comparison of two stream temperature models and evaluation of potential management alternatives for the Speed River, Southern Ontario.
    Norton GE; Bradford A
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Feb; 90(2):866-78. PubMed ID: 18406513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A basin-scale approach to estimating stream temperatures of tributaries to the lower Klamath River, California.
    Flint LE; Flint AL
    J Environ Qual; 2008; 37(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 18178878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stream temperature response to three riparian vegetation scenarios by use of a distributed temperature validated model.
    Roth TR; Westhoff MC; Huwald H; Huff JA; Rubin JF; Barrenetxea G; Vetterli M; Parriaux A; Selkeer JS; Parlange MB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Mar; 44(6):2072-8. PubMed ID: 20131784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptive management and water temperature variability within a South African river system: what are the management options?
    Rivers-Moore NA; Jewitt GP
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 16563604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effective management alternatives for Snake River Chinook salmon: a biological-economic synthesis.
    Halsing DL; Moore MR
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):338-50. PubMed ID: 18402583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can stream and riparian restoration offset climate change impacts to salmon populations?
    Justice C; White SM; McCullough DA; Graves DS; Blanchard MR
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Mar; 188():212-227. PubMed ID: 27984794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptive management of flows in the lower Roanoke River, North Carolina, USA.
    Pearsall SH; McCrodden BJ; Townsend PA
    Environ Manage; 2005 Apr; 35(4):353-67. PubMed ID: 15891942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors influencing the persistence of fecal Bacteroides in stream water.
    Bell A; Layton AC; McKay L; Williams D; Gentry R; Sayler GS
    J Environ Qual; 2009; 38(3):1224-32. PubMed ID: 19398520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incorporating groundwater-surface water interaction into river management models.
    Valerio A; Rajaram H; Zagona E
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(5):661-73. PubMed ID: 20412319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toward efficient riparian restoration: integrating economic, physical, and biological models.
    Watanabe M; Adams RM; Wu J; Bolte JP; Cox MM; Johnson SL; Liss WJ; Boggess WG; Ebersole JL
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Apr; 75(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 15763152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving representation of riparian vegetation shading in a regional stream temperature model using LiDAR data.
    Loicq P; Moatar F; Jullian Y; Dugdale SJ; Hannah DM
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 May; 624():480-490. PubMed ID: 29268220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trout population responses to restoration of stream flows.
    Covington JS; Hubert WA
    Environ Manage; 2003 Jan; 31(1):135-46. PubMed ID: 12447581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patterns of water, heat, and solute flux through streambeds around small dams.
    Fanelli RM; Lautz LK
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(5):671-87. PubMed ID: 18522652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Climate change mitigation for agriculture: water quality benefits and costs.
    Wilcock R; Elliott S; Hudson N; Parkyn S; Quinn J
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(11):2093-9. PubMed ID: 19092184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impacts of water resources development on flow regimes in the Brazos River.
    Vogl AL; Lopes VL
    Environ Monit Assess; 2009 Oct; 157(1-4):331-45. PubMed ID: 18819012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantifying water savings from willow removal in Australian streams.
    Doody T; Benyon R
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Mar; 92(3):926-35. PubMed ID: 21106290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heat, chloride, and specific conductance as ground water tracers near streams.
    Cox MH; Su GW; Constantz J
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 17335483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling the contribution of point sources and non-point sources to Thachin River water pollution.
    Schaffner M; Bader HP; Scheidegger R
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Aug; 407(17):4902-15. PubMed ID: 19501876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of pollutants removal efficiency to achieve successful urban river restoration.
    Cha SM; Ham YS; Ki SJ; Lee SW; Cho KH; Park Y; Kim JH
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(11):2101-9. PubMed ID: 19494448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research note: modeling of the water quality of Büyüksu Stream, Bolu, Turkey.
    Yildirim M; Sen E; Külköylüoğlu O
    Water Environ Res; 2009 Mar; 81(3):325-36. PubMed ID: 19378662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.