BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18407894)

  • 21. Interval estimation of inverse dose-response.
    Alho JM; Valtonen E
    Biometrics; 1995 Jun; 51(2):491-501. PubMed ID: 7662838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics.
    Hajian-Tilaki K
    J Biomed Inform; 2014 Apr; 48():193-204. PubMed ID: 24582925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Verification bias-corrected estimators of the relative true and false positive rates of two binary screening tests.
    Alonzo TA
    Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):403-17. PubMed ID: 15543634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sample size determination for matched-pair equivalence trials using rate ratio.
    Tang NS; Tang ML; Wang SF
    Biostatistics; 2007 Jul; 8(3):625-31. PubMed ID: 17071862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interval estimation of the mean response in a log-regression model.
    Wu J; Wong AC; Wei W
    Stat Med; 2006 Jun; 25(12):2125-35. PubMed ID: 16220472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interval estimation of the over-dispersion parameter in the analysis of one-way layout of count data.
    Saha KK
    Stat Med; 2011 Jan; 30(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 20839369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Confidence intervals following group sequential tests in clinical trials.
    Kim K; DeMets DL
    Biometrics; 1987 Dec; 43(4):857-64. PubMed ID: 3427170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nonparametric estimation and testing in a cure model.
    Laska EM; Meisner MJ
    Biometrics; 1992 Dec; 48(4):1223-34. PubMed ID: 1290799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interval estimation of the proportion ratio under multiple matching.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1275-85. PubMed ID: 15565736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bayesian estimation of intervention effect with pre- and post-misclassified binomial data.
    Stamey JD; Seaman JW; Young DM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(1):93-108. PubMed ID: 17219757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Model-based multiplicity estimation of population size.
    Laska EM; Meisner M; Wanderling J
    Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(17):2230-52. PubMed ID: 19572380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Determining the area under the ROC curve for a binary diagnostic test.
    Cantor SB; Kattan MW
    Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(4):468-70. PubMed ID: 11059479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Statistical discrimination in the presence of selection effects.
    Hilliam RM
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1219-32. PubMed ID: 15565581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Point estimation following group sequential tests.
    Kim K
    Biometrics; 1989 Jun; 45(2):613-7. PubMed ID: 2765641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing equivalence or non-inferiority in screening tests with paired and independent binomial endpoints through confidence intervals for the odds ratio.
    Zaslavsky BG
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2837-55. PubMed ID: 16134143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interval estimation for Weibull-distributed life data under Type II progressive censoring with random removals.
    Tse SK; Xiang L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Feb; 13(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 12635899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Exact confidence limits for prevalence of a disease with an imperfect diagnostic test.
    Reiczigel J; Földi J; Ozsvári L
    Epidemiol Infect; 2010 Nov; 138(11):1674-8. PubMed ID: 20196903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A sequential design to estimate sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic or screening test.
    Wruck LM; Yiannoutsos CT; Hughes MD
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(20):3458-73. PubMed ID: 16374904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in paired designs.
    Nofuentes JA; Del Castillo Jde D
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(22):4179-201. PubMed ID: 17357992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Resampling dependent concordance correlation coefficients.
    Williamson JM; Crawford SB; Lin HM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):685-96. PubMed ID: 17613648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.