179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18407894)
41. Estimating lead time and sensitivity in a screening program without estimating the incidence in the screened group.
Straatman H; Peer PG; Verbeek AL
Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):217-29. PubMed ID: 9147591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Estimation of prediction error for survival models.
Lawless JF; Yuan Y
Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(2):262-74. PubMed ID: 19882678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Confidence intervals for the mean of diagnostic test charge data containing zeros.
Zhou XH; Tu W
Biometrics; 2000 Dec; 56(4):1118-25. PubMed ID: 11129469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Evaluation of exact and asymptotic interval estimators in logistic analysis of matched case-control studies.
Vollset SE; Hirji KF; Afifi AA
Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1311-25. PubMed ID: 1786321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A note on P-values under group sequential testing and nonproportional hazards.
Gillen DL; Emerson SS
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):546-51. PubMed ID: 16011703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of weighted kappa coefficients of multiple binary diagnostic tests done on the same subjects.
Roldán Nofuentes JA; Luna del Castillo JD
Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2149-65. PubMed ID: 20809538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A likelihood approach to estimating sensitivity and specificity for binocular data: application in ophthalmology.
de Leon AR; Guo M; Rudnisky CJ; Singh G
Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(17):3300-14. PubMed ID: 17211837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Bias correction of two-state latent Markov process parameter estimates under misclassification.
Rosychuk RJ; Thompson ME
Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(12):2035-55. PubMed ID: 12802821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Validity and efficiency of approximation methods for tied survival times in Cox regression.
Hertz-Picciotto I; Rockhill B
Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):1151-6. PubMed ID: 9333345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Confidence intervals construction for difference of two means with incomplete correlated data.
Li HQ; Tang NS; Yi JY
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():31. PubMed ID: 26969507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. On uncertainty in medical testing.
Winkler RL; Smith JE
Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 15534345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A simple and efficient bias-reduced estimator of response probability following a group sequential phase II trial.
Guo HY; Liu A
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):773-81. PubMed ID: 16078384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Difference of two dependent sensitivities and specificities: Comparison of various approaches.
Wenzel D; Zapf A
Biom J; 2013 Sep; 55(5):705-18. PubMed ID: 23828661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Assessing observer agreement in studies involving replicated binary observations.
Haber M; Gao J; Barnhart HX
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):757-66. PubMed ID: 17613652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Nearly unbiased estimators for the three-parameter Weibull distribution with greater efficiency than the iterative likelihood method.
Cousineau D
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):167-91. PubMed ID: 18177546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Eight interval estimators of a common rate ratio under stratified Poisson sampling.
Lui KJ
Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1283-96. PubMed ID: 15083483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Implication of inverse-probability weighting method in the evaluation of diagnostic test with verification bias].
Kang L; Zhang S; Zhao F; Qiao Y
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 35(3):329-32. PubMed ID: 24831638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of conditional bias-adjusted estimators for interim analysis in clinical trials with survival data.
Shimura M; Gosho M; Hirakawa A
Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(13):2067-2080. PubMed ID: 28211076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Two-stage procedures for selecting the best diagnostic biomarkers.
Liu A; Wu C; Yu KF
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2008 Jul; 366(1874):2293-9. PubMed ID: 18407902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
