These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18407982)

  • 1. Technical note: prediction of breeding values using marker-derived relationship matrices.
    Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Sep; 86(9):2089-92. PubMed ID: 18407982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
    Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using eigenvalues as variance priors in the prediction of genomic breeding values by principal component analysis.
    Macciotta NP; Gaspa G; Steri R; Nicolazzi EL; Dimauro C; Pieramati C; Cappio-Borlino A
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Jun; 93(6):2765-74. PubMed ID: 20494186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of imputing markers from a low-density chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations.
    Dassonneville R; Brøndum RF; Druet T; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Ducrocq V; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jul; 94(7):3679-86. PubMed ID: 21700057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The importance of haplotype length and heritability using genomic selection in dairy cattle.
    Villumsen TM; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Feb; 126(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 19207924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population.
    Pszczola M; Strabel T; Mulder HA; Calus MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):389-400. PubMed ID: 22192218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient parentage assignment and pedigree reconstruction with dense single nucleotide polymorphism data.
    Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Apr; 94(4):2114-7. PubMed ID: 21427003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle using a simple heritable genetic ground.
    Pribyl J; Rehout V; Citek J; Pribylova J
    J Sci Food Agric; 2010 Aug; 90(11):1765-73. PubMed ID: 20564310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of marker-assisted selection with single markers and marker haplotypes in cattle.
    Hayes BJ; Chamberlain AJ; McPartlan H; Macleod I; Sethuraman L; Goddard ME
    Genet Res; 2007 Aug; 89(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 18208627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting energy balance for dairy cows using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism information.
    Verbyla KL; Calus MP; Mulder HA; de Haas Y; Veerkamp RF
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Jun; 93(6):2757-64. PubMed ID: 20494185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of genomic breeding values for dairy traits in Italian Brown and Simmental bulls using a principal component approach.
    Pintus MA; Gaspa G; Nicolazzi EL; Vicario D; Rossoni A; Ajmone-Marsan P; Nardone A; Dimauro C; Macciotta NP
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jun; 95(6):3390-400. PubMed ID: 22612973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic evaluation in the presence of uncertain additive relationships. I. Use of phenotypic information to ascertain paternity.
    Sapp RL; Zhang W; Bertrand JK; Rekaya R
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2391-400. PubMed ID: 17504957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for multivariate threshold and continuous data in a simulated horse population using Gibbs sampling and residual maximum likelihood.
    Stock KF; Hoeschele I; Distl O
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Oct; 124(5):308-19. PubMed ID: 17868084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical note: Use of marker-based relationships with multiple-trait derivative-free restricted maximal likelihood.
    Zhang Z; Todhunter RJ; Buckler ES; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Apr; 85(4):881-5. PubMed ID: 17085728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short communication: Genomic selection using a multi-breed, across-country reference population.
    Pryce JE; Gredler B; Bolormaa S; Bowman PJ; Egger-Danner C; Fuerst C; Emmerling R; Sölkner J; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 May; 94(5):2625-30. PubMed ID: 21524555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending.
    Su G; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Christensen OF; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):909-17. PubMed ID: 22281355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Confirmation of quantitative trait loci using a low-density single nucleotide polymorphism map for twinning and ovulation rate on bovine chromosome 5.
    Allan MF; Kuehn LA; Cushman RA; Snelling WM; Echternkamp SE; Thallman RM
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jan; 87(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 18791147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid inversion of additive by additive relationship matrices by including sire-dam combination effects.
    VanRaden PM; Hoeschele I
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Feb; 74(2):570-9. PubMed ID: 2045563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of reduced marker set estimation of genomic relationship matrices on genomic selection for feed efficiency in Angus cattle.
    Rolf MM; Taylor JF; Schnabel RD; McKay SD; McClure MC; Northcutt SL; Kerley MS; Weaber RL
    BMC Genet; 2010 Apr; 11():24. PubMed ID: 20403185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DNA-based paternity analysis and genetic evaluation in a large, commercial cattle ranch setting.
    Van Eenennaam AL; Weaber RL; Drake DJ; Penedo MC; Quaas RL; Garrick DJ; Pollak EJ
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3159-69. PubMed ID: 17878282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.