These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18410531)

  • 1. Direct and indirect fitness consequences of female choice in a crustacean.
    Cothran RD
    Evolution; 2008 Jul; 62(7):1666-1675. PubMed ID: 18410531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The behavior of Gammarus aequicauda (crustacea, amphipoda) during predation on chironomid larvae: Sex differences and changes in precopulatory mate-guarding state.
    Shadrin N; Yakovenko V; Anufriieva E
    J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol; 2021 Jul; 335(6):572-582. PubMed ID: 34184831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ecological context and the importance of body and gnathopod size for pairing success in two amphipod ecomorphs.
    Wellborn GA; Bartholf SE
    Oecologia; 2005 Mar; 143(2):308-16. PubMed ID: 15776289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Male size does not affect the strength of male mate choice for high-quality females in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Lev A; Pischedda A
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Sep; 36(9):1255-1265. PubMed ID: 37534751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
    Bonduriansky R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cryptic sex-ratio bias provides indirect genetic benefits despite sexual conflict.
    Cox RM; Calsbeek R
    Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5974):92-4. PubMed ID: 20203012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Female preference for rare males is maintained by indirect selection in Trinidadian guppies.
    Potter T; Arendt J; Bassar RD; Watson B; Bentzen P; Travis J; Reznick DN
    Science; 2023 Apr; 380(6642):309-312. PubMed ID: 37079663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Female resistance to sexual coercion can evolve to preserve the indirect benefits of mate choice.
    Snow SS; Alonzo SH; Servedio MR; Prum RO
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):545-558. PubMed ID: 30817033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does foreplay matter? Gammarus pulex females may benefit from long-lasting precopulatory mate guarding.
    Galipaud M; Dechaume-Moncharmont FX; Oughadou A; Bollache L
    Biol Lett; 2011 Jun; 7(3):333-5. PubMed ID: 21068026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. You can't always get what you want: size assortative mating by mutual mate choice as a resolution of sexual conflict.
    Baldauf SA; Kullmann H; Schroth SH; Thünken T; Bakker TC
    BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Jun; 9():129. PubMed ID: 19515244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An experimental test for indirect benefits in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Rundle HD; Odeen A; Mooers AØ
    BMC Evol Biol; 2007 Mar; 7():36. PubMed ID: 17349042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sexual conflict over mating in Gnatocerus cornutus? Females prefer lovers not fighters.
    Okada K; Katsuki M; Sharma MD; House CM; Hosken DJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Jun; 281(1785):20140281. PubMed ID: 24807253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fitness effects of female mate choice: preferred males are detrimental for Drosophila melanogaster females.
    Friberg U; Arnqvist G
    J Evol Biol; 2003 Sep; 16(5):797-811. PubMed ID: 14635895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of two acanthocephalan species on the reproduction of Hyalella patagonica (Amphipoda, Hyalellidae) in an Andean Patagonian Lake (Argentina).
    Rauque CA; Semenas L
    J Invertebr Pathol; 2009 Jan; 100(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 18938173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system.
    Orteiza N; Linder JE; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1315-23. PubMed ID: 16135126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of male dominance in female Anastrepha curvicauda mate selection.
    Salmerón-Muñiz NN; Arzuffi R; Robledo-Quintos N; Jiménez-Pérez A
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6311. PubMed ID: 33737687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A cost of sexual attractiveness to high-fitness females.
    Long TA; Pischedda A; Stewart AD; Rice WR
    PLoS Biol; 2009 Dec; 7(12):e1000254. PubMed ID: 19997646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predation risk regulates prey assortative mating by reducing the expected reproductive value of mates.
    Torsekar VR; Zaguri M; Hawlena D
    Ecology; 2023 Feb; 104(2):e3869. PubMed ID: 36088576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The indirect benefits of mating with attractive males outweigh the direct costs.
    Head ML; Hunt J; Jennions MD; Brooks R
    PLoS Biol; 2005 Feb; 3(2):e33. PubMed ID: 15678167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.