These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18410531)

  • 21. Conflict between direct and indirect benefits of female choice in desert Drosophila.
    Onealt E; Connallon T; Knowles LL
    Biol Lett; 2007 Feb; 3(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 17443958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Degree of adaptive male mate choice is positively correlated with female quality variance.
    Nandy B; Joshi A; Ali ZS; Sen S; Prasad NG
    Sci Rep; 2012; 2():447. PubMed ID: 22685628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reproductive character displacement of male stickleback mate preference: reinforcement or direct selection?
    Albert AY; Schluter D
    Evolution; 2004 May; 58(5):1099-107. PubMed ID: 15212390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.
    Jennions MD; Petrie M
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 1997 May; 72(2):283-327. PubMed ID: 9155244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mate-sampling costs and sexy sons.
    Kokko H; Booksmythe I; Jennions MD
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Jan; 28(1):259-66. PubMed ID: 25399634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. You're Just My Type: Mate Choice and Behavioral Types.
    Munson AA; Jones C; Schraft H; Sih A
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2020 Sep; 35(9):823-833. PubMed ID: 32451175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Non-random mating and information theory.
    Carvajal-Rodríguez A
    Theor Popul Biol; 2018 Mar; 120():103-113. PubMed ID: 29391186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The evolution of repeated mating in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides.
    House CM; Evans GM; Smiseth PT; Stamper CE; Walling CA; Moore AJ
    Evolution; 2008 Aug; 62(8):2004-14. PubMed ID: 18489722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Trial marriage model-Female mate choice under male interference.
    Li MY; Geng ZS; Liao P; Wang XY; Yang TC; Wang JY; Wang DD; Gao LF; Du B
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Aug; 89(8):1851-1859. PubMed ID: 32329064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Female Choice or Male Sex Drive? The Advantages of Male Body Size during Mating in Drosophila Melanogaster.
    Jagadeeshan S; Shah U; Chakrabarti D; Singh RS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144672. PubMed ID: 26658421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Female mate preferences in Drosophila simulans: evolution and costs.
    Sharma MD; Tregenza T; Hosken DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Aug; 23(8):1672-9. PubMed ID: 20546089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Do female Nicrophorus vespilloides reduce direct costs by choosing males that mate less frequently?
    Hopwood PE; Mazué GP; Carter MJ; Head ML; Moore AJ; Royle NJ
    Biol Lett; 2016 Mar; 12(3):20151064. PubMed ID: 26979560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Indirect mate choice, direct mate choice and species recognition in a bower-building cichlid fish lek.
    Genner MJ; Young KA; Haesler MP; Joyce DA
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1387-96. PubMed ID: 18547351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Low level of polyandry constrains phenotypic plasticity of male body size in mites.
    Schausberger P; Walzer A; Murata Y; Osakabe M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188924. PubMed ID: 29190832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Polyandry produces sexy sons at the cost of daughters in red flour beetles.
    Pai A; Yan G
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Feb; 269(1489):361-8. PubMed ID: 11886623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An indirect cue of predation risk counteracts female preference for conspecifics in a naturally hybridizing fish Xiphophorus birchmanni.
    Willis PM; Rosenthal GG; Ryan MJ
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e34802. PubMed ID: 22529936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Direct fitness benefits explain mate preference, but not choice, for similarity in heterozygosity levels.
    Zandberg L; Gort G; van Oers K; Hinde CA
    Ecol Lett; 2017 Oct; 20(10):1306-1314. PubMed ID: 28868784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Transgenerational effects of maternal sexual interactions in seed beetles.
    Zajitschek SRK; Dowling DK; Head ML; Rodriguez-Exposito E; Garcia-Gonzalez F
    Heredity (Edinb); 2018 Sep; 121(3):282-291. PubMed ID: 29802349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects.
    Miller CW; Moore AJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 May; 274(1615):1279-86. PubMed ID: 17341455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.